Casey v. Schneider
Decision Date | 01 October 1877 |
Citation | 96 U.S. 496,24 L.Ed. 790 |
Parties | CASEY v. SCHNEIDER |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
The bill in this case was filed by Casey, receiver of the New Orleans National Banking Association, against Louis Schneider, George Jonas, and Patrick Irwin, the original defendants, who were trustees for the New Orleans Clearing-house, to compel them to deliver up notes and bills receivable and other securities to the amount of $223,677.25, and other assets to the amount of $57,500, which were pledged to the said trustees to secure the payment of clearing-house certificates issued to said bank to the amount of $199,000, from the 25th of September, 1873, to the time of its failure, Oct. 4 in that year, to enable it to settle its daily balances and exchanges with the other banks of the city represented in said clearing-house. These securities were delivered to the trustees in pledge as aforesaid at or before the issue of the clearing-house certificates which they were intended to secure; and said securities, or the proceeds thereof, were, until the bringing of this suit, kept by the trustees in their own possession for the purposes for which they had been pledged.
The articles of association, or agreement under which this transaction took place, were contained in an act passed before a notary-public on the 24th of September, 1873, when the several banks temporarily suspended cash payments under the influence of the financial panic which then occurred. The following is a copy of the provisions of said act, which was signed and entered into by fifteen banks of New Orleans:——
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Ward
...to secure a debt, the pledgee acquires a special property in them: White v. Platt, 5 Denio, 269; Casey v. Cavaroc, 96 U. S. 476; Casey v. Schneider, 96 U. S. 496. Corporations are liable for the frauds of their agents when committed in the course of their employment: Phil. R. R. Co. v. Quig......
-
Prentiss Tool & Supply Co. v. Godchaux
... ... Civ. Code La. art ... 2997), but, as it concerns movables, it need not be in ... writing (Id. art. 3158; Casey v. Schneider, ... 96 U.S. 496). If the partial payments which appear by ... indorsement on two of the notes in evidence were made by ... authority ... ...
- Casey v. Schuchardt