Casner v. Gahlman
| Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | Casner v. Gahlman, 60 Kan. 857, 56 P. 1131 (Kan. 1899) |
| Decision Date | 11 March 1899 |
| Parties | CASNER v. GAHLMAN. |
Error from court of appeals. Northern department. Central division.
Action by Joseph Gahlman against Nicholas Casner. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the court of appeals (51 P. 56), and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
Fred W. Casner, for plaintiff in error.
Burch & Burch, for defendant in error.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Cave v. Rinehart
... ... Stat. 1909, § 9474.) The ... inclusion of the other charges is sufficient to avoid the ... deed based upon such a notice. (Casner v. Gahlman, ... 6 Kan.App. 295, 51 P. 56, 60 Kan. 857, 56 P. 1131; ... Shinkle v. Meek, 69 Kan. 368, 76 P. 837; Harp v ... Wilson, 84 Kan. 45, ... ...
-
Gibson v. McClees
...a defect, it was cured by the answer of appellant, who set out in his answer the source and nature of his claim of title. ( Casner v. Gahlman, 60 Kan. 857, 56 P. 1131; v. Wilson, 84 Kan. 45, 113 P. 309; Brice v. Sayler, 82 Kan. 500, 108 P. 815; Parker v. Vaughn, 85 Kan. 324, 116 P. 882.) Th......
