Cassius v. Arizona

Citation420 U.S. 514,95 S.Ct. 1345,43 L.Ed.2d 362
Decision Date03 March 1975
Docket NumberNo. 74-5140,74-5140
PartiesMichael J. CASSIUS, petitioner, v. State of ARIZONA
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

Frederick S. Klein, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court.

William J. Schafer, III, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent.

On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice BLACKMUN and Mr. Justice POWELL dissent.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Cook
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 3 Agosto 1995
    ...Ariz. 485, 487, 520 P.2d 1109, 1111, cert. granted, 419 U.S. 824, 95 S.Ct. 41, 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974), cert. dismissed, 420 U.S. 514, 95 S.Ct. 1345, 43 L.Ed.2d 362 (1975), in which the court The question of whether two offenses are the same, and the criteria for resolving that question, are s......
  • State v. Stevens
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 8 Octubre 1987
    ...13-1580 or -3970. The state incorrectly cites State v. Cassius, 110 Ariz. 485, 520 P.2d 1109 (1974), cert. dismissed, 420 U.S. 514, 95 S.Ct. 1345, 43 L.Ed.2d 362 (1975), to support this proposition. State v. Cassius does not so hold. Nor are we aware of any holding on this point. We need no......
  • State v. Corrales
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 14 Abril 1976
    ...put twice in jeopardy. State v. Cassius, 110 Ariz. 485, 520 P.2d 1109 (1974), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 420 U.S. 514, 95 S.Ct. 1345, 43 L.Ed.2d 362 (1975). In reaching this result, the Supreme Court considered the double jeopardy issue although it had not been raised in the ......
  • Alexander v. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 31 Diciembre 1990
    ...construed so as to give effect to each, if possible. State v. Cassius, 110 Ariz. 485, 520 P.2d 1109, cert. dismissed, 420 U.S. 514, 95 S.Ct. 1345, 43 L.Ed.2d 362 (1974). The courts must harmonize statutes if possible, and must not construe a statute as repealed by implication if such a cons......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT