Castillo v. Starrett City, Inc.
Decision Date | 02 February 2004 |
Docket Number | 2003-00984.,2003-03410. |
Citation | 2004 NY Slip Op 00485,772 N.Y.S.2d 74,4 A.D.3d 320 |
Parties | MELBIN CASTILLO, Appellant, v. STARRETT CITY, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. NJK CONTRACTORS, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.
On July 21, 1999, the plaintiff, a laborer employed by the third-party defendant, NJK Contractors, Inc. (hereinafter NJK), was injured while installing insulation on the roof of a building located at 225 Vandalia Avenue in Brooklyn, when he allegedly slipped on a small piece of insulation and lost his balance, and his left arm became submerged in an open container of hot tar when he tried to get up.
The plaintiff's contention that his Labor Law § 241 (6) claim is properly predicated on violations of 12 NYCRR 23-2.1 (a), 23-1.7 (e) (1) and 23-1.24 (d), is without merit. 12 NYCRR 23-2.1 (a), which requires that "building materials" be "stored in a safe and orderly manner" and that "material piles" be stable and "so located that they do not obstruct any passageway, walkway, stairway or other thoroughfare," is inapplicable because the material that caused the plaintiff to fall was not being "stored" but was in use, the accident did not involve a "material pile" but rather a single, small piece of insulation, and the roof where the accident occurred was not a "passageway, walkway, stairway or other thoroughfare" (see Motyka v Ogden Martin Sys. of Onondaga Ltd. Partnership, 272 AD2d 980, 981 [2000]). Similarly, 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (e) (1),...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Flores v. Infrastructure Repair Serv., LLC
...cover. 12 N.Y.C.R.R. § 23–1.24(d) is inapplicable to a tar container with “no lid or cover of any kind,” Castillo v. Starrett City, 4 A.D.3d 320, 322, 772 N.Y.S.2d 74 (2d Dep't 2004), and thus does not prohibit use of an open bucket to carry hot tar. Id. ; Stasierowski v. Conbow Corp., 258 ......
-
Neto v. Magellan Concrete Structures Corp.
... ... (Runner v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 13 N.Y.3d 599, ... 603 [2009]; see Wilinski, 18 N.Y.3d at 10). With ... undertaking" (Outar v City of New York, 5 ... N.Y.3d 731, 732 [2005]; see Quattrocchi v F.J ... 1360, 1362 [2d Dept 2011]; Castillo v ... Starrett, 4 A.D.3d 320, 321-322 [2d Dept 2004]; see ... also Miles ... ...
-
Lopez v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Env't Prot.
...where the object that caused the plaintiff's injury was an integral part of the work being performed (see Castillo v. Starrett City, 4 A.D.3d 320, 322, 772 N.Y.S.2d 74 ; Harvey v. Morse Diesel Intl., 299 A.D.2d 451, 452–453, 750 N.Y.S.2d 117 ; Alvia v. Teman Elec. Contr., 287 A.D.2d 421, 42......
-
Lopez v.
...where the object that caused the plaintiff's injury was an integral part of the work being performed ( see Castillo v. Starrett City, 4 A.D.3d 320, 322, 772 N.Y.S.2d 74; Harvey v. Morse Diesel Intl., 299 A.D.2d 451, 452–453, 750 N.Y.S.2d 117; Alvia v. Teman Elec. Contr., 287 A.D.2d 421, 423......