Caverly v. Deere
Decision Date | 23 February 1895 |
Docket Number | 112. |
Citation | 66 F. 305 |
Parties | CAVERLY v. DEERE et al. [1] |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Suit for damages, and to enjoin infringement of letters patent No 303,116, issued August 5, 1884, to Sarah Caverly, assignee of Amos K. Caverly, for a machine for rounding bent handles, of which the four claims are as follows:
'(3) A cutter head constructed of two cylindrical disks, each with such a concave on its inner face, extending from beyond the diameter to the periphery, that when secured with their curved faces together the concaves form a groove on the periphery of the head corresponding to the shape and size of the dressed work, with one or more recesses extending from the outer face of each disk, diminishing in width as they progress, terminating in a narrow opening in the curve, forming beds for the cutters and spouts for the discharge of chips, with slotted knives secured in the openings, and adjustable longitudinally therein by set screws.
'(4) The combination of the frame, the cutter head with groove in its periphery, and one or more openings from each side, terminating in a narrow slit on the groove, one or more knives so curved that the bevel on their cutting ends presents a flat surface, and gearing by which the head is actuated.'
The following extracts from the brief will illustrate the argument of counsel for the appellant:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Butcher v. Truck Insurance Exchange
...or immediately prior thereto, a farming corporation." (McLaughlin, supra, 94 F.2d at 493.) 14. The other cases cited, Caverly v. Deere (7th Cir. 1895) 66 F. 305, 308; Russell v. Kern (7th Cir. 1895) 69 F. 94; and Evans v. Suess Ornamental Glass Co. (7th Cir. 1897) 83 F. 706, cert. denied 17......
-
Butcher v. Truck Insurance Exchange
...filing its petition or immediately prior thereto, a farming corporation." (94 F.2d at 493.) 14. The other cases cited, Caverly v. Deere (7th Cir. 1895) 66 F. 305, 308; Russell v. Kern (7th Cir. 1895) 69 F. 94; and Evans v. Suess Ornamental Glass Co. (7th Cir. 1897) 83 F. 706, cert. denied 1......
-
Columbus Safe-Deposit Co. v. Burke
...Russell v. Kern, 34 U.S.App. 90, 16 C.C.A. 154, and 69 F. 94; Caverly's Adm'r v. Deere & Co., 24 U.S.App. 617, 630, 13 C.C.A. 452, and 66 F. 305; Insurance Co. Hamilton, 22 U.S.App. 548, 11 C.C.A. 42, and 63 F. 93. The tenth, eleventh, and twelfth specifications are to the effect that the c......
-
ENTERPRISE RAILWAY E. CO. v. PULLMAN STANDARD C. MFG. CO
...it lacked novelty." Campbell exercised the option of adhering to one form or trying the other. This was not invention. Caverly v. Deere, 7 Cir., 66 F. 305, at page 308; Torrey v. Hancock, 8 Cir., 184 F. 61, at page 68; Eddy v. Dennis, 95 U.S. 560, at page 570, 24 L.Ed Plaintiff also relies ......