Cawthon v. Jones
Decision Date | 26 May 1927 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 840 |
Parties | CAWTHON v. JONES. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; William M. Walker Judge.
Bill by A.K. Cawthon against Lanis M. Jones to establish a resulting trust in lands. From a decree denying relief, complainant appeals. Affirmed.
E.H Dryer and W.B. Harrison, both of Birmingham, for appellant.
Hugh A Locke and Frederick V. Wells, both of Birmingham, for appellee.
The rule of resulting trust "depends upon the equitable presumption of intention." 3 Pomeroy, Eq.Jur. 2358; Lord v. Reed, 254 Ill. 350, 98 N.E. 553, Ann.Cas. 1913C, 139. The rule of resulting trust and the burden of proof in the premises was recently discussed in Montgomery v. McNutt, 214 Ala. 693, 108 So. 752, Heflin v. Heflin, 208 Ala. 69, 93 So. 719, and Guin v. Guin, 196 Ala. 221, 72 So. 74, and need not be repeated. No good purpose would be conserved by a detailed discussion of the respective tendencies of the evidence. It is sufficient to say that we are of the opinion that the decree of the circuit court is correct in denying the relief prayed and in dismissing the bill. The burden of proof was upon Cawthon, seeking benefit of alleged resulting trust, to show by evidence, clearly and convincingly, his right of recovery as prayed--that he furnished the money for the purchase of the land and the title was erroneously or wrongfully taken in the name of another (Guin v. Guin, 196 Ala. 221, 72 So. 74)--by evidence clear, convincing, strong, and unequivocal (Emfinger v. Emfinger, 137 Ala. 337, 34 So. 346). There was ample evidence to support the judgment rendered and from which the appeal is taken.
The question of gift was within the issues adduced by the tendencies of the oral evidence, though there was no special plea of gift. Such inference was within complainant's own evidence. Jones v. Russell, 206 Ala. 215, 89 So. 660; Nat. Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. White, 210 Ala. 345, 97 So. 914. Complainant alleged that on or about February 1, 1920, he "delivered to the said (respondent) $5,500, with which to purchase and pay the purchase price for the" lots specifically described, with the agreement and understanding with the said Lanis M. Jones that said property was to be conveyed to your complainant and a deed made to your complainant"; that she "purchased said lot, but that instead of having the title conveyed to your complainant she took a conveyance to herself and had the then owner of said property, W.E. Shine and his wife, to execute a deed conveying said property to her *** that he paid all the purchase price for said land and that both under agreement heretofore referred to between himself and the said defendant, and in equity and good conscience the title to said land should be invested in him."
The answer was as follows:
Thus the issues were broad enough, as treated by the trial court to warrant the evidence offered and the treatment thereof by the court necessary to a right inquiry of fact of gift vel non of moneys or the payment thereof to respondent under an agreement to purchase real property in the name of the complainant. Complainant failed to establish his right to relief by evidence that was strong, unequivocal, and convincing. Holt v. Johnson, 166 Ala. 358, 52 So. 323; Kimbrough v. Nelms, 104 Ala. 554, 16 So. 619; Emfinger v. Emfinger, supra. He had the burden of showing (under his bill) that he gave money to the respondent for the purpose of buying the property described and to take the title in his name; the answer denied that he gave her money for such purpose, or that his moneys went into its...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Moss v. Winston
... ... Guin, 196 Ala. 221, 72 So. 74; Milner v ... Stanford, 102 Ala. 277, 14 So. 644; Hodges v ... Verner, 100 Ala. 612, 13 So. 679; Cawthon v ... Jones, 216 Ala. 260, 113 So. 231; L.R.A.1916B, 174, 175 ... In ... Butts v. Cooper, 152 Ala. 375, 385, 44 So. 616, 619, ... the ... ...
-
Buttrey v. Buttrey
... ... 519, 113 So. 535; Milton Realty ... Co. v. Wilson, 214 Ala. 143, 107 So. 92; Faulk v ... McDuffie, 215 Ala. 584, 112 So. 229; Cawthon v ... Jones, 216 Ala. 260, 113 So. 231 ... The ... presumptions as to the correctness of the finding of the ... register by the ... ...
-
Rankin v. Wheeler
...Trusts are creatures of courts of equity and are enforceable in such tribunals (Heflin v. Heflin, 208 Ala. 69, 93 So. 719; Cawthon v. Jones [[Ala.Sup.] 113 So. 231), and a court of equity may be resorted to when necessary to right administration of an estate. The books show a frequent appli......
-
Gulf Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Johnson
...waiver of the defendants' failure to plead the same specially.' Jones v. Russell, 206 Ala. 215, 219, 89 So. 660, 663. See: Cawthon v. Jones, 216 Ala. 260, 113 So. 231; Johnson v. Odom, 11 Ala.App. 364, 66 So. 853. For helpful annotation on 'Pleading waiver, estoppel, and res judicata,' see ......