Cent. Of Ga. Ry. Co v. Dozier
| Decision Date | 26 June 1903 |
| Citation | Cent. Of Ga. Ry. Co v. Dozier, 45 S.E. 67, 117 Ga. 793 (Ga. 1903) |
| Parties | CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. DOZIER. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
RAILROADS—KILLING STOCK—EVIDENCE.
1. In a suit for damages for killing stock, the plaintiff offered no eyewitness to the transaction. While weak and unsatisfactory, the testimony as to the tracks of the animal and other physical facts was sufficient, when aided by the presumption of negligence, to warrant a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the evidence of the engineer and fireman tended to show the exercise of ordinary care and diligence. See Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Harden, 3S S. E. 949, 113 Ga. 455; Same v. Hardin, 40 S. E. 738, 114 Ga. 548.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Talbot County; W. B. Butt, Judge.
Action by Allen Dozier against the Central of Georgia Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
Little & Battle and A. J. Persons, for plaintiff in error.
J. J. Bull, for defendant in error.
LAMAR, J. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Ga. Coast & P. R. Co v. Smith
...of the defendant, this court should not disturb it on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence." In Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Dozier, 117 Ga. 793, 45 S. E. 67, it was said: "In a suit for damages for killing stock the plaintiff offered no eyewitness to the transaction. While ......
-
Georgia Coast & P.R. Co. v. Smith
... ... that the verdict is contrary to the evidence." ... In ... Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Dozier, 117 Ga. 793, 45 S.E ... 67, it was said: ... "In a suit for damages for killing stock the plaintiff ... offered no eyewitness to the ... ...
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Dozier