Central Bank Trust Co v. United States Boyle v. United States
| Decision Date | 01 October 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 1269,No. 1270,1269,1270 |
| Citation | 88 S.Ct. 1845,391 U.S. 469,20 L.Ed.2d 749 |
| Parties | CENTRAL BANK & TRUST CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. Dages I. BOYLE v. UNITED STATES et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
See 89 S.Ct. 69.
Earl S. Wilson, Earl W. Kintner, Sidney Harris and George R. Kucik, for appellant Central Bank & Trust Co.
Earl S. Wilson and Frank S. Ginocchio, for appellant Dages I. Boyle.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Howard E. Shapiro, for the United States.
Paul A. Porter and Victor H. Kramer, for appellees First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. and others.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set these cases for oral argument.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. International Telephone & Tel. Corp.
...v. First Nat'l Bk. & Trust Co., 280 F.Supp. 260, 263 (E.D.Ky.1967), aff'd per curiam sub nom. Central Bk. & Trust Co. v. United States, 391 U.S. 469, 88 S.Ct. 1845, 20 L.Ed.2d 749 (1968), where a competitor bank was allowed to intervene to oppose a consent judgment on a finding by the court......
-
Grenfell v. Duffy
...(1953), 203 F.2d 463; U. S. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington, Kentucky (1967), 280 F.Supp. 260, aff'd 391 U.S. 469, 88 S.Ct. 1845, 20 L.Ed.2d 749 (1968). The relevant portion of Rule 24(a), M.R.Civ.P., "Intervention of right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted ......
-
Danila v. Dobrea, 1276
... ... United States ... May 27, 1968 ... Rehearing Denied ... Central Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct ... ...