Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Main

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
Writing for the CourtTYSON, J.
Citation33 So. 480,135 Ala. 451
PartiesCENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. MAIN.
Decision Date20 January 1903

33 So. 480

135 Ala. 451

CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO.
v.
MAIN.

Supreme Court of Alabama

January 20, 1903


Appeal from circuit court, Bullock county; A. A. Evans, Judge.

Action by W. C. Main against the Central of Georgia Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

G. L. Comer, for appellant.

T. S. Frazer, for appellee.

TYSON, J.

The single assignment of error is predicated upon the refusal of the trial court, upon objection, to permit defendant, on cross-examination, to ask plaintiff how much he paid for the mule some three months prior to its being killed by one of defendant's locomotives. The purpose of the inquiry, it is fairly inferable, was to show the market value of the mule at the time and place it was killed; the place being some 24 miles distant from where the plaintiff purchased it. The price paid by plaintiff was not a fact on which any reasonable inference as to the market value of the mule, at the time and place it was killed, could be based. Roden v. Brown, 103 Ala. 324, 15 So. 598; Railroad Co. v. Moore, 109 Ala. 393, 19 So. 804; Clothing Co. v. Lischkoff, 109 Ala. 136, 19 So. 436.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Puckett
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • January 21, 1904
    ...G. S. R. R. Co. v. Moore, 109 Ala. 393, 19 So. 804; Roden v. Brown, 103 Ala. 324, 15 So. 598; Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480. There was evidence tending to prove the averments of the replication--that the goods supplied in fulfillment of defendant's ord......
  • Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Edmondson
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • January 21, 1903
    ...33 So. 480 135 Ala. 336 CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. EDMONDSON. Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 21, Appeal from circuit court, Henry county; John P. Hubbard, Judge. Action by B. W. Edmondson against the Central of Georgia Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. A......
  • Massey v. Fain
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1911
    ...the past could not be fairly looked to as determining their present market value." And in the case of Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480, the court said that evidence of what the plaintiff paid for the mule three months before the time the subject of inquiry and at......
3 cases
  • Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Puckett
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • January 21, 1904
    ...G. S. R. R. Co. v. Moore, 109 Ala. 393, 19 So. 804; Roden v. Brown, 103 Ala. 324, 15 So. 598; Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480. There was evidence tending to prove the averments of the replication--that the goods supplied in fulfillment of defendant's ord......
  • Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Edmondson
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • January 21, 1903
    ...33 So. 480 135 Ala. 336 CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. EDMONDSON. Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 21, Appeal from circuit court, Henry county; John P. Hubbard, Judge. Action by B. W. Edmondson against the Central of Georgia Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. A......
  • Massey v. Fain
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1911
    ...the past could not be fairly looked to as determining their present market value." And in the case of Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480, the court said that evidence of what the plaintiff paid for the mule three months before the time the subject of inquiry and at......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT