Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Main
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Writing for the Court | TYSON, J. |
Citation | 33 So. 480,135 Ala. 451 |
Parties | CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. MAIN. |
Decision Date | 20 January 1903 |
33 So. 480
135 Ala. 451
CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO.
v.
MAIN.
Supreme Court of Alabama
January 20, 1903
Appeal from circuit court, Bullock county; A. A. Evans, Judge.
Action by W. C. Main against the Central of Georgia Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
G. L. Comer, for appellant.
T. S. Frazer, for appellee.
TYSON, J.
The single assignment of error is predicated upon the refusal of the trial court, upon objection, to permit defendant, on cross-examination, to ask plaintiff how much he paid for the mule some three months prior to its being killed by one of defendant's locomotives. The purpose of the inquiry, it is fairly inferable, was to show the market value of the mule at the time and place it was killed; the place being some 24 miles distant from where the plaintiff purchased it. The price paid by plaintiff was not a fact on which any reasonable inference as to the market value of the mule, at the time and place it was killed, could be based. Roden v. Brown, 103 Ala. 324, 15 So. 598; Railroad Co. v. Moore, 109 Ala. 393, 19 So. 804; Clothing Co. v. Lischkoff, 109 Ala. 136, 19 So. 436.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Puckett
...G. S. R. R. Co. v. Moore, 109 Ala. 393, 19 So. 804; Roden v. Brown, 103 Ala. 324, 15 So. 598; Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480. There was evidence tending to prove the averments of the replication--that the goods supplied in fulfillment of defendant's ord......
-
Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Edmondson
...33 So. 480 135 Ala. 336 CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. EDMONDSON. Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 21, Appeal from circuit court, Henry county; John P. Hubbard, Judge. Action by B. W. Edmondson against the Central of Georgia Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. A......
-
Massey v. Fain
...the past could not be fairly looked to as determining their present market value." And in the case of Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480, the court said that evidence of what the plaintiff paid for the mule three months before the time the subject of inquiry and at......
-
Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Puckett
...G. S. R. R. Co. v. Moore, 109 Ala. 393, 19 So. 804; Roden v. Brown, 103 Ala. 324, 15 So. 598; Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480. There was evidence tending to prove the averments of the replication--that the goods supplied in fulfillment of defendant's ord......
-
Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Edmondson
...33 So. 480 135 Ala. 336 CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. EDMONDSON. Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 21, Appeal from circuit court, Henry county; John P. Hubbard, Judge. Action by B. W. Edmondson against the Central of Georgia Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. A......
-
Massey v. Fain
...the past could not be fairly looked to as determining their present market value." And in the case of Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Main, 135 Ala. 451, 33 So. 480, the court said that evidence of what the plaintiff paid for the mule three months before the time the subject of inquiry and at......