Central State Hosp. v. Wiggers
Decision Date | 11 October 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 841441,841441 |
Citation | 335 S.E.2d 257,230 Va. 157 |
Parties | CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL, et al. v. Brenda Fay WIGGERS. Record |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
Donald S. Elmore, Richmond, (Elmore & Parker, Richmond, on brief), for appellants.
Sylvester G. Sheppard, Petersburg, Va., for appellee.
Present: All the Justices.
The sole question in this Workers' compensation appeal is whether there was evidence to support the Industrial Commission's finding that the claimant had sustained an injury by accident arising out of her employment.
Brenda Fay Wiggers was employed as a clerk at Central State Hospital. On August 2, 1983, she arose from her desk and walked toward an adjoining office, a distance of about ten steps, to answer a telephone. She testified:
The claimant did not testify that she slipped, tripped, stumbled, or fell, but merely that she "turned" or "twisted" her ankle while walking normally. "[I]n the process of going for the phone I don't know if the floor was slippery or what, but I twisted my ankle." She testified that there was no rug on the floor, that it was flat and level, and was free of water or other liquid. Some construction work had been going on in the area, but, she said, She surmised that the floor might have been slippery from some unknown cause: * She described the shoes she was wearing as "loafers." There was no further evidence concerning the cause of her injury.
The deputy commissioner held that the claimant's injury was "idiopathic" and did not arise out of her employment. The full Commission, one commissioner dissenting, reversed, finding that she "turned her ankle while walking along a floor made slippery by an unknown substance causing the claimant to turn her ankle and suffer an immediate injury." (emphasis added). The record provides no support, beyond the claimant's speculation, for these findings.
The claimant had the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, and not merely by conjecture or speculation, that she suffered an injury by accident which arose out of and in the course of the employment. King's Market v. Porter, 227 Va. 478, 484, 317 S.E.2d 146, 149 (1984); Humphries v. N.N.S.B., Etc., Co., 183 Va. 466, 479, 32 S.E.2d 689, 695 (1945); Carter v. Hercules Powder Co., 182 Va. 282, 288, 28 S.E.2d 736, 738 (1944).
We agree with the deputy commissioner, and with the dissenting commissioner, that this case is controlled by Richmond Mem. Hosp. v. Crane, 222 Va. 283, 278 S.E.2d 877 (1981), to which it bears a marked similarity. In Crane, a hospital employee arose from a chair and began to walk normally, "going straight forward." Id. at 284, 278 S.E.2d at 878. Upon taking her second step, she felt "something snap" and sustained a muscle tear in her right...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
O'Donoghue v. United Cont'l Holdings, Inc.
...relationship between his accident (in this case, his electrocution) and the conditions of his employment. Cent. State Hosp. v. Wiggers, 230 Va. 157, 159, 335 S.E.2d 257 (1985) (quoting Richmond Mem. Hosp. v. Crane, 222 Va. 283, 285, 278 S.E.2d 877 (1981) ). It is a mixed question of law and......
-
Bernard v. Carlson Companies–Tgif
...S.E.2d 56, 58 (1995); Metcalf v. A.M. Express Moving Sys., 230 Va. 464, 468, 339 S.E.2d 177, 180 (1986); Cent. State Hosp. v. Wiggers, 230 Va. 157, 159, 335 S.E.2d 257, 259 (1985); Richmond v. Braxton, 230 Va. 161, 164, 335 S.E.2d 259, 261 (1985); R & T Invs. v. Johns, 228 Va. 249, 253, 321......
-
Jennings v. Richmond Pub. Sch.
...56, 58 (1995); Metcalf v. A. M. Express Moving Sys., Inc., 230 Va. 464, 468, 339 S.E.2d 177, 180 (1986); Cent. State Hosp. v. Wiggers, 230 Va. 157, 159, 335 S.E.2d 257, 259 (1985); City of Richmond v. Braxton, 230 Va. 161, 164, 335 S.E.2d 259, 261 (1985); R & T Invs., 228 Va. at 253, 321 S.......
-
Burney-Divens v. Cmty. Corr. Administration/Commonwealth
...that she suffered an injury by accident which arose out of and in the course of the employment." Cent. St. Hosp. v. Wiggers, 230 Va. 157, 159, 335 S.E.2d 257, 258 (1985). "Thus, for an injury to be compensable under the Workers' Compensation Act, the claimant must prove threeelements: (1) t......