Century Data Sys., Inc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Decision Date08 March 1983
Docket NumberDocket No. 2227-76.
Citation80 T.C. 529
PartiesCENTURY DATA SYSTEMS, INC., and CALIFORNIA COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC., PETITIONERS v. COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT
CourtU.S. Tax Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

James G. Phillipp and Daniel M. Davidson, for the petitioners.

John O. Kent, for the respondent.

OPINION

FAY , Judge:

Respondent determined the following deficiencies in and additions to petitioner Century Data Systems, Inc.'s Federal income tax for the following taxable years:1

+--------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦                              ¦            ¦Additions to tax  ¦
                +------------------------------+------------+------------------¦
                ¦Taxable year or period ended  ¦Deficiency  ¦sec. 6653(a)2     ¦
                +------------------------------+------------+------------------¦
                ¦                              ¦            ¦                  ¦
                +------------------------------+------------+------------------¦
                ¦June 30, 1970                 ¦$28,044.59  ¦0                 ¦
                +------------------------------+------------+------------------¦
                ¦June 30, 1971                 ¦6,202,136.50¦$310,106.83       ¦
                +------------------------------+------------+------------------¦
                ¦Mar. 31, 1972                 ¦945,551.13  ¦47,277.56         ¦
                +--------------------------------------------------------------+
                

This case is before the Court on petitioners' motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 120.

Both petitioners, Century Data Systems, Inc. (hereafter petitioner) and California Computer Products, Inc. (hereafter Cal Comp), had their principal places of business in Anaheim, Calif., when they filed their petition in this case. At all relevant times, both petitioner and Cal Comp were engaged in the business of manufacturing components and related items for electronic computer systems. Cal Comp owned a large portion of petitioner's stock. On December 12, 1974, petitioner was liquidated and all of its assets were transferred to, and all of its liabilities were assumed by, Cal Comp. As such, Cal Comp is joined as a co-petitioner solely by reason of its status as successor in interest to petitioner.

From the date of its incorporation on July 30, 1968, through December 31, 1971, petitioner kept its books on the basis of a calendar year. Thus, petitioner filed Federal income tax returns for its calendar years ended December 31, 1968, and December 31, 1969. On the assumption it could properly join Cal Comp in a consolidated return for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, petitioner filed a short-period return for the 6-month period January 1, 1970, through June 30, 1970.3 By way of explanation, petitioner attached the following statement to this return:

Taxpayer hereby elects to change its taxable year from a calendar year to a fiscal year ending June 30. This election is made pursuant to Reg. 1.1502-76 and thereby conforms the year of the taxpayer to its parent for the purpose of filing a consolidated tax return for the year July 1, 1970 through June 30, 1971, and thereafter.

The balance of petitioner's income and deductions for the remaining 6 months of 1970 and the first 6 months of 1971 was reported and included in Cal Comp's initial consolidated return for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971. Petitioner also joined in the consolidated return of Cal Comp for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1972.

As it turned out, petitioner was not entitled to join in a consolidated return until April 3, 1972, when Cal Comp acquired more than 80 percent of the common stock of petitioner.4 For this reason, respondent issued a notice of deficiency since petitioner “failed to qualify under section 1504 of the Internal Revenue Code to entitle petitioner to file a consolidated return.” The statutory notice asserted deficiencies for petitioner's taxable years ending June 30, 1970, June 30, 1971, and March 31, 1972.

The issue arises herein because, as respondent readily admits, he issued a notice of deficiency for nonexistent taxable years. Even though petitioner mistakenly joined in fiscal year consolidated returns, it continued to keep its books on a calendar year basis. Thus, petitioner's correct taxable years were December 31, 1970, December 31, 1971, and April 3, 1972 (see sec. 441), whereas respondent issued a statutory notice for taxable years ending June 30, 1970, June 30, 1971, and March 31, 1972. Petitioners contend the statutory notice is totally ineffective to confer jurisdiction on this Court to find any deficiency whatsoever in the correct taxable years. Respondent claims this defect does not invalidate the statutory notice with respect to petitioner's taxable years ended December 31, 1970, and December 31, 1971.5

On substantially identical facts and in a Court-reviewed opinion, this Court held it is without jurisdiction to redetermine a deficiency for the incorrect taxable years. See Atlas Oil & Refining Corp. v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 733 (1951) (hereafter Atlas Oil I). Shortly after the taxpayer in Atlas Oil I was incorporated, it adopted through its bylaws a fiscal year ending November 30. At the same time, the rules of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) required the taxpayer to keep its books on the basis of a calendar year. In conformity with ICC regulations, the taxpayer formally closed its books on December 31, 1942, and December 31, 1943. Presumably to take advantage of the audited income statement prepared by its independent accountants in deference to its bylaws, the taxpayer filed its 1942 and 1943 Federal income tax returns on the basis of a fiscal year ended November 30. Not unexpectedly, respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's fiscal years ending November 30, 1942, and November 30, 1943. The Court first made a finding of fact that the taxpayer's books were indeed kept on a calendar year basis. Then the Court entered a decision for the taxpayer since the deficiencies were incorrectly determined on a fiscal year basis. Atlas Oil I at 740.6

As in the case before us, Atlas Oil I involved a statutory notice covering 2 incorrect taxable years but nevertheless encompassing the entire correct taxable year. Respondent acknowledges Atlas Oil I controls herein if it is still good law. He claims, however, that Atlas Oil I was impliedly overruled by this Court's more recent opinion in Sanderling, Inc. v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 743 (1976), affd. on this issue 571 F.2d 174 (3d Cir. 1978).

In Sanderling, the corporate taxpayer, after completing its process of liquidation, closed its final taxable year on January 22, 1969. The statutory notice was issued for its normal fiscal year ending February 28, 1969. Consequently, the statutory notice covered a total of 37 days beyond the end of the correct taxable year. In holding we had jurisdiction even though the statutory notice set forth an incorrect taxable year, this Court stated:

Even though * * * [the period ending February 28, 1969] was subsequently determined not to be * * * [the taxpayer's] correct taxable year, where the notice is based on the taxpayer's final tax period and covers the entire period of the taxpayer's operations, it is a valid determination for that period.* * * [ Sanderling, Inc. v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. at 749.]

Under Sanderling, respondent claims that so long as no part of a taxpayer's correct taxable year extends beyond the taxable year(s) asserted in the statutory notice(s), that notice is not invalid.7 Since the statutory notice in Atlas Oil I covered the taxpayer's entire correct taxable year (calendar year 1942), respondent concludes Atlas Oil I has been overruled, though not expressly so, by our holding in Sanderling. 8

We cannot agree with respondent that the holding in Atlas Oil I was overruled by our more recent opinion in Sanderling. The cases are readily distinguishable and, as we have noted, neither Sanderling nor any subsequent case purports to overrule Atlas Oil I.9 The statutory notice in Sanderling determined a deficiency for a taxable year covering the taxpayer's complete, albeit short, taxable year. Moreover, the additional 37-day period erroneously included in that notice was not a part of any taxable period since the taxpayer had terminated its existence. In contrast, the statutory notice in Atlas Oil I covered less than the taxpayer's full taxable year and included a portion of another taxable year.

This distinction is more than theoretical. The additional 37-day period in Sanderling represented a period of time the taxpayer was simply not in existence. Thus, it obviously had no income or deductions during this 37-day period which would either increase or decrease the asserted deficiency. On the other hand, where the statutory notice describes an incorrect taxable year composed of some portion of each of 2 correct taxable years, the notice is inherently erroneous because the deficiency asserted has necessarily omitted items of income and deduction of the correct taxable year and has included other items which properly belong in another taxable year. The distinction is readily apparent. Absent a clear expression to do so, it cannot be said that Atlas Oil I was overruled by Sanderling.

Moreover, we reaffirm the holding in Atlas Oil I. We have long held that respondent has no authority to issue a notice of deficiency for a period less than the taxpayer's full taxable year. Pittsburgh Realty Investment Trust v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 260, 282 (1976); Schick v. Commissioner, 45 T.C. 368 (1966); Columbia River Orchards, Inc. v. Commissioner, 15 T.C. 253 (1950) (reviewed by the Court); Oklahoma Contracting Corp. v. Commissioner, 35 B.T.A. 232 (1937); Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. v. Commissioner, 32 B.T.A. 66 (1935); Elgin Compress Co. v. Commissioner, 31 B.T.A. 273 (1934) (reviewed by the Board); Brooklyn City Railroad Co. v. Commissioner, 27 B.T.A. 77 (1932), affd. 72 F.2d 274 (2d Cir. 1934); Smith v. Commissioner, 26 B.T.A. 1178 (1932). The basis of these decisions is that, under ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Cook v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue , Docket No. 6463-80.
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 8 Marzo 1983
    ...of law, as indicated by our rather lengthy discussion above. See also Kasey v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1642, 1651 (1970), affd. per [80 T.C. 529] curiam 457 F.2d 369 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 869 (1972). The situation herein, in our view, simply does not warrant the imposition of......
  • Lockheed Sanders, Inc. v. US
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire
    • 24 Agosto 1994
    ...to redetermine the deficiency because the notice of deficiency used the incorrect taxable years. Century Data Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 529, 537, 1983 WL 14807 (1983). The Tax Court stated that "the proper procedure is for the commissioner to issue a new notice of deficiency wi......
  • Upchurch v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 9 Julio 2007
    ...has held the notices of deficiency invalid. These cases that petitioner relies upon are distinguishable: Century Data Sys. Inc. v. Commissioner [Dec. 39,945], 80 T.C. 529 (1983), Atlas Oil & Ref. Corp. v. Commissioner [Dec. 18,601], 17 T.C. 733 (1951), and Columbia River Orchards, Inc. v. C......
  • Scardina v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 14 Enero 1988
    ...year or a fiscal year." Section 441(b)(1), I.R.C. 1954; section 1.441-1(b)(1)(i), Income Tax Regs. See Century Data Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner Dec. 39,945, 80 T.C. 529, 531 (1983); Dougherty v. Commissioner Dec. 32,138, 60 T.C. 917, 932-933 (1973); Atlas Oil and Refining Corp. v. Commiss......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT