Cerciello v. MacConchie, A-Z

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation660 A.2d 552,282 N.J.Super. 436
PartiesJoseph CERCIELLO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas MacCONCHIE and Gale MacConchie, husband and wife; Defendants-Respondents, and John Almand, manufacturer; and Angler Manufacturing, manufacturer; Frank's Boats; Walter Rogers; John Doe, being a fictitious name for a supplier or distributor of pleasure boats and/or boat seats; Pomtanette, Inc.; Garelick Manufacturing Co., manufacturer of the seat on which plaintiff was injured; and John Moe, being fictitious name for a manufacturer of the boat, Defendants.
Docket NumberA-Z
Decision Date05 July 1995

Page 436

282 N.J.Super. 436
660 A.2d 552
Joseph CERCIELLO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas MacCONCHIE and Gale MacConchie, husband and wife;
Defendants-Respondents,
and
John Almand, manufacturer; and Angler Manufacturing,
manufacturer; Frank's Boats; Walter Rogers; John Doe A-Z,
being a fictitious name for a supplier or distributor of
pleasure boats and/or boat seats; Pomtanette, Inc.;
Garelick Manufacturing Co., manufacturer of the seat on
which plaintiff was injured; and John Moe A-Z, being
fictitious name for a manufacturer of the boat, Defendants.
Superior Court of New Jersey,
Appellate Division.
Submitted June 27, 1995.
Decided July 5, 1995.

[660 A.2d 553]

Page 437

Drazin & Warshaw, Red Bank, for appellant (John R. Connelly, Jr., of counsel, and on the brief).

Dowd & Reilly, Red Bank, for respondents Thomas and Gale MacConchie (Bernard M. Reilly, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER and PETRELLA.

Page 438

PER CURIAM.

This personal injury action arises out of a pleasure-boating accident that occurred on the afternoon of August 13, 1988. Plaintiff Joseph Cerciello, Jr. appeals from an order granting summary judgment dismissing his complaint. Because the trial court relied upon principles of liability not here applicable, we reverse the court's order dismissing plaintiff's cause of action against defendant Thomas MacConchie, the owner and operator of the vessel herein involved. We affirm, however, that part of the order dismissing plaintiff's claim against defendant Gale MacConchie.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Plaintiff and defendant Thomas MacConchie were friends of long-standing, and plaintiff was MacConchie's frequent guest on recreational excursions on the twenty-one-foot fiberglass open fishing boat which MacConchie purchased from its previous owner in 1986. Plaintiff sometimes assisted MacConchie in performing minor repairs to the boat, most often relating to a faulty charging system, and in wiping down the boat at the end of the day's outing. The craft was propelled by an engine situated at the rear and was equipped with two seats, one for the operator and one for a passenger, located in the cabin toward the front of the boat. A pole supported each seat, the underside of which consisted of a piece of plywood. The seat base was affixed to the pole by means of a bracket screwed [660 A.2d 554] into the plywood. The seat back was, in turn, attached to the seat base by means of additional brackets that were also screwed into the plywood.

On the day of the accident, plaintiff met MacConchie in the early afternoon and assisted him in charging the boat's batteries. Gale MacConchie, Thomas's wife, then arrived at the dock, and all three went for a ride in the boat. After spending a few hours in Belford Channel, where they swam and met other friends, the party returned to shore in order to drop off Mrs. MacConchie, who had a late afternoon appointment.

Page 439

The two men again headed out into the channel, MacConchie driving and plaintiff seated in the passenger chair. Mr. MacConchie was increasing speed as the boat approached the end of Belford Channel when suddenly the back of the passenger chair gave way causing plaintiff to fall backwards, landing on his neck, back and shoulders. As a result of this fall, plaintiff suffered spinal injury. Evidently, neither plaintiff nor defendant Thomas MacConchie had been aware that the seat was in any imminent danger of collapsing, and, in fact, Gale MacConchie had earlier that day been seated there with her...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Bruno v. Merv Griffin's Resorts Intern. Casino, No. Civ.A. 96-7543.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • 23 Febrero 1999
    ...store owner created dangerous condition even though plaintiff did not have evidence of how accident occurred); Cerciello v. MacConchie, 282 N.J.Super. 436, 660 A.2d 552, 555 (N.J.Super.1995) (reversing grant of summary judgment because issues of material fact existed in negligence action ag......
1 cases
  • Bruno v. Merv Griffin's Resorts Intern. Casino, No. Civ.A. 96-7543.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • 23 Febrero 1999
    ...store owner created dangerous condition even though plaintiff did not have evidence of how accident occurred); Cerciello v. MacConchie, 282 N.J.Super. 436, 660 A.2d 552, 555 (N.J.Super.1995) (reversing grant of summary judgment because issues of material fact existed in negligence action ag......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT