Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Lockyer
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Citation | 437 F.3d 890 |
Decision Date | 09 February 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 03-55166.,No. 03-55169.,03-55166.,03-55169. |
Parties | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF The UNITED STATES; California Chamber of Commerce; Employers Group; California Healthcare Association; California Manufacturers and Technology Assn.; California Association of Health Facilities; California Association of Home & Services for the Aging; Bettec Corporation; Marksherm Corporation; Zilaco Inc., Zilaco; Del Rio Healthcare, Inc.; Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. dba Beverly Manor Costa Mesa; Internext Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees, American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, Intervenors-Appellants, v. Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; Department of Health Services; Frank G. Vanacore, as the Chief of the Audit Review and Analysis Section of the California Department of Health Services; Diana M. Bonta, Diana M. Bonta, R.N., Dr., P.h.D, as the Director of the California Department of Health Services, Defendants. Chamber of Commerce of the United States; California Chamber of Commerce; Employers Group; California Healthcare Association; California Manufacturers and Technology Assn.; California Association of Health Facilities; California Association of Home & Services for the Aging; Bettec Corporation; Marksherm Corporation; Zilaco Inc., Zilaco; Del Rio Healthcare, Inc.; Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. dba Beverly Manor Costa Mesa; Internext Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, Intervenors, v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; Department of Health Services; Frank G. Vanacore, as the Chief of the Audit Review and Analysis, Section of the California Department of Health Services; Diana M. Bonta, Diana M. Bonta, R.N., Dr., P.h.D, as the Director of the California Department of Health Services, Defendants-Appellants. |
Stephen A. Bokat, Esq., National Chamber Litigation Center, Bradley W. Kampas, Esq., Washington, DC, Scott W. Oborne, Esq., Jackson Lewis LLP, Mark E. Reagan, Esq., Hooper Lundy & Bookman, Inc., San Francisco, CA, Mark Anthony Johnson, Esq., AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Intervenors-Appellants/Intervenors.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
Healthcare Ass'n of New York State, Inc. v. Pataki
...superseding opinion, 422 F.3d 973 (9th Cir.2005). The Ninth Circuit then vacated the panel opinion and granted rehearing en banc, 437 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.2006), and has just recently decided that the California statute at issue is not preempted by federal labor law. Chamber of Commerce v. Loc......
-
Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Lockyer
...from publication for reconsideration en banc. See Chamber of Commerce v. Lockyer, 435 F.3d 999 (9th Cir.2006); Chamber of Commerce v. Lockyer, 437 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.2006). We now reverse the district court's judgment that the NLRA preempts the California statute and vacate the court's injun......
- Smith v. Patrick
-
Smith v. Mitchell
... ... * OPINION PER CURIAM:This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for the second time. We reiterate the ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results