Chamdlee v. Johnson, 15492.
| Decision Date | 06 June 1946 |
| Docket Number | No. 15492.,15492. |
| Citation | Chamdlee v. Johnson, 38 S.E.2d 721 (Ga. 1946) |
| Parties | CHAMDLEE et al. v. JOHNSON. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
1.The evidence was sufficient to establish prescriptive title to land by written evidence of title and seven years' adverse possession.
(a) The rule requiring continuity of possession is one of substance and not of absolute mathematical continuity, provided there is no break so as to make a severance of two possessions.
2.While the payment of taxes is not itself evidence of title, yet it is admissible as a circumstance tending to prove adverse possession.
3.The admission in evidence of the document described in the corresponding division of the opinion was not reversible error.
Error from Superior Court, Chattooga County; C. H. Porter, Judge.
Action by J. Earl Johnson against J. C. Chamblee and others to enjoin the cutting of timber on a described tract of land and to recover damages for timber allegedly cut.There was a judgment for plaintiff, and the defendants bring error.
Judgment affirmed.
J. Earl Johnson sued J. C. Chamblee and others to enjoin the cutting of timber on a described tract of land, containing seventy-six acres, and to recover damages for timber alleged to have been cut.The jury found in favor of Johnson.
Johnson sought to establish title by prescription under color of title.He introduced two recorded deeds to separate parcels, making one single tract of seventy-six acres, executed by W. R. Chastain to J. E. Johnson in 1920; and another deed from J. E. Johnson to J. Earl Johnson, dated January 10, 1942.J. E. Johnson was the father of J. Earl Johnson.Under the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and under the first amendment thereto, it is insisted by the plaintiff in error that the evidence did not show a continuous possession which could ripen into a title by prescription.
The evidence to establish possession of the land, which was situated on a mountain, and so far as the record discloses had never been cultivated or fenced, was as follows: J. Earl Johnson testified:
Upon cross-examination, the witness testified:
Mrs. J. B. Persley testified:
Joe Murphy testified: "I know what part of it was Mr. Johnson's property.
I know that they have been coming up there for a number of years and have made it their summer home."
W. H. Stokes testified: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Byrd v. Shelley
...sufficient to sustain a finding of actual possession. Davis v. Newton, 217 Ga. 75, 76-77, 121 S.E.2d 153 (1961); Chamblee v. Johnson, 200 Ga. 838, 38 S.E.2d 721 (1946) (using property for camping and a summer home and building rock wall and cabin); Mitchell v. Gunter, 170 Ga. 135, 142, 152 ......
-
Chamblee v. Johnson
...38 S.E.2d 721 200 Ga. 838 CHAMBLEE et al. v. JOHNSON. No. 15492.Supreme Court of GeorgiaJune 6, 1946 ... ... Syllabus by the Court ... 1. The ... evidence was sufficient ... ...