Chance v. United States, M-18.
Citation | 80 Ct. Cl. 692,9 F. Supp. 1011 |
Decision Date | 04 March 1935 |
Docket Number | No. M-18.,M-18. |
Parties | CHANCE v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | Court of Federal Claims |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Maurice D. Rosenberg and Harvey D. Jacob, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
Joseph H. Sheppard, of Washington, D. C., and Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.
The plaintiff, receiver of the City Club of Washington, D. C., sues to recover taxes paid on dues and admission fees of the club's members for the period from June, 1924, to April, 1930, amounting to $40,015.25. The taxes involved were collected under the provisions of section 801 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921, 40 Stat. 1121, 42 Stat. 291, section 501 of the Revenue Acts of 1924 and 1926 (26 USCA § 872 note), or section 413 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1928 (26 USCA § 872). These acts and the applicable Treasury Regulations have been considered by the court in numerous cases. We do not deem it necessary to review the decisions in these cases at length. The rule by which it must be determined whether a club seeking exemption from the tax is or is not a social club within the meaning of the taxing acts is clearly stated in the case of Army & Navy Club of America v. United States, 53 F.(2d) 277, 282, 72 Ct. Cl. 684:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dolco Inv., Ltd. v. Moonriver Development, Ltd.
... ... No. 06 Civ. 12876(RWS) ... United States District Court, S.D. New York ... April 26, 2007 ... Page 262 ... ...
-
Krug v. Rasquin
...277, Ct.Cl., certiorari denied 285 U.S. 548, 52 S.Ct. 405, 76 L.Ed. 939; Century Association v. Anderson, D.C., 10 F.Supp. 1005; Chance v. U. S., 9 F.Supp. 1011, Ct.Cl.; Chicago Engineers' Club v. U. S., 9 F.Supp. 680, Ct.Cl.; Faculty Club of University of California v. U. S., 65 Ct.Cl. 754......
-
Lake of the Forest Club v. United States
...a substantial part of its activities and that it is a social club within the meaning of the Act. Affirmed. 1 Chance v. United States, 9 F.Supp. 1011, 80 Ct.Cl. 692; Chicago Engineers' Club v. United States, 9 F.Supp. 680, 80 Ct.Cl. 615; Union League Club of Chicago v. United States, 4 F.Sup......