Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Automo

Decision Date17 March 2010
Docket NumberNo. 09-55123.,09-55123.
Citation598 F.3d 1115
PartiesStuart CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Don Howarth, Howarth & Smith, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Kevin J. Dunne, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, San Francisco, CA, (argued); Kirk C. Jenkins, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Chicago, IL, for the defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding.D.C.No. 2:08-cv-03184-GAF-E, Central District of California, Los Angeles.

Before PAMELA ANN RYMER and KIM McLANE WARD LAW, Circuit Judges, and STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, *Senior District Judge.

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its published opinion at 596 F.Supp.2d 1314(C.D.Cal.2008), attached as Appendix A.

AFFIRMED.

*.The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
40 cases
  • Sywula v. Teleport Mobility, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 23 d1 Janeiro d1 2023
    ...move to dismiss a claim based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, including the absence of standing. Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1123 (9th Cir. 2010). A Rule 12(b)(1) challenge to jurisdiction may be facial or factual. Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F......
  • Jeremiah M. v. Crum
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Alaska
    • 28 d4 Setembro d4 2023
    ...F.3d at 778 (quoting Noel, 341 F.3d at 1165). 116. Docket 23 at 44-52; Docket 25 at 44-53 (sealed). 117. Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010). 118. Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004). 119. Id. 120. Lujan v. Defs. of......
  • Greenley v. Kochava, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 27 d4 Julho d4 2023
    ...move to dismiss a claim based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, including the absence of standing. Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1123 (9th Cir. 2010). A Rule 12(b)(1) challenge to jurisdiction may be facial or factual. Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F......
  • Barron v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Alaska
    • 2 d3 Janeiro d3 2019
    ...1-1 at 1.34 Docket 1 (Notice of Removal) at 1, 5.35 Docket 1-1 at 6–7, ¶¶ 3.1–3.8.36 Docket 9 at 2.37 Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. , 598 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010).38 See Roberts v. Corrothers , 812 F.2d 1173, 1177–78 (9th Cir. 1987) ; Kingman Reef Atoll Invs., L.L.C. v. ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT