Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Automo

• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
• Writing for the Court: STEPHEN M. McNAMEE
• Citation: Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010)
• Decision Date: 17 March 2010
• Docket Number: No. 09-55123.,09-55123.
• Parties: Stuart CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

598 F.3d 1115

Stuart CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-55123.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2010.

Filed March 17, 2010.

Don Howarth, Howarth & Smith, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Kevin J. Dunne, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, San Francisco, CA, (argued); Kirk C. Jenkins, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Chicago, IL, for the defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:08-cv-03184-GAF-E, Central District of California, Los Angeles.

Before PAMELA ANN RYMER and KIM McLANE WARD LAW, Circuit Judges, and STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, ^* Senior District Judge.

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its published opinion at 596 F.Supp.2d 1314 (C.D.Cal.2008), attached as Appendix A.

AFFIRMED.

*. The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.