Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Automo
Decision Date | 17 March 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 09-55123.,09-55123. |
Citation | 598 F.3d 1115 |
Parties | Stuart CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Don Howarth, Howarth & Smith, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Kevin J. Dunne, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, San Francisco, CA, (argued); Kirk C. Jenkins, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Chicago, IL, for the defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding.D.C.No. 2:08-cv-03184-GAF-E, Central District of California, Los Angeles.
Before PAMELA ANN RYMER and KIM McLANE WARD LAW, Circuit Judges, and STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, *Senior District Judge.
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its published opinion at 596 F.Supp.2d 1314(C.D.Cal.2008), attached as Appendix A.
AFFIRMED.
*.The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Sywula v. Teleport Mobility, Inc.
...move to dismiss a claim based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, including the absence of standing. Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1123 (9th Cir. 2010). A Rule 12(b)(1) challenge to jurisdiction may be facial or factual. Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F......
-
Jeremiah M. v. Crum
...F.3d at 778 (quoting Noel, 341 F.3d at 1165). 116. Docket 23 at 44-52; Docket 25 at 44-53 (sealed). 117. Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010). 118. Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004). 119. Id. 120. Lujan v. Defs. of......
-
Greenley v. Kochava, Inc.
...move to dismiss a claim based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, including the absence of standing. Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 598 F.3d 1115, 1123 (9th Cir. 2010). A Rule 12(b)(1) challenge to jurisdiction may be facial or factual. Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F......
-
Barron v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
...1-1 at 1.34 Docket 1 (Notice of Removal) at 1, 5.35 Docket 1-1 at 6–7, ¶¶ 3.1–3.8.36 Docket 9 at 2.37 Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. , 598 F.3d 1115, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010).38 See Roberts v. Corrothers , 812 F.2d 1173, 1177–78 (9th Cir. 1987) ; Kingman Reef Atoll Invs., L.L.C. v. ......