Chapman v. Atlantic Transportation Co.
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Citation | Chapman v. Atlantic Transportation Co., 94 A.2d 215, 11 N.J. 213 (N.J. 1953) |
| Decision Date | 26 January 1953 |
| Parties | Walter P. CHAPMAN, petitioner-respondent, v. ATLANTIC TRANSPORTATION CO., respondent-petitioner. |
On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
See same case below: 21 N.J.Super. 589, 91 A.2d 502.
Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, Newark, for the petitioner.
Carl Gelman, Paterson, and Aaron Gordon, Jersey City, for the respondent.
Denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Hodgdon v. Project Packaging, Inc.
...537 (App.Div.1986); Chapman v. Atlantic Transportation Co., 21 N.J.Super. 589, 591, 91 A.2d 502 (App.Div.1952), certif. den. 11 N.J. 213, 94 A.2d 215 (1953). The ability to do light or intermittent work was not necessarily inconsistent with a finding of total incapacity. Harbatuk, 211 N.J.S......
-
Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.
...and that fact is duly established. Chapman v. Atlantic Trans. Co., 21 N.J.Super. 589, 91 A.2d 502 (1952), Cert. denied, 11 N.J. 213, 94 A.2d 215 (1953). In this case we conclude that plaintiff claimant's healing period extended beyond the period of maximum recovery from his operation to the......
