Chapman v. First Index, Inc.
Docket Number | 14-2773,14-2775 |
Decision Date | 06 August 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
150 cases
-
Koss v. Norwood
...moot only when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever to the prevailing party." Chapman v. 1st Index, Inc. , 796 F.3d 783, 785 (7th Cir. 2015) (quoting Knox v. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union, Local 1000 , 567 U.S. 298, 307, 132 S.Ct. 2277, 183 L.Ed.2d 281 (2012) ).Defe......
-
Berger v. Perry's Steakhouse of Ill., LLC
...validity of the offset fee policy itself, and the issue of damages.Tender of partial payment. Defendants, citing Chapman v. First Index, Inc. , 796 F.3d 783 (7th Cir. 2015), contend that Plaintiffs' refusal of the offset fee tender should "preclude Plaintiffs from continuing to sue on amoun......
-
Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Allscripts Health Solutions, Inc.
...receiving future messages." Turza , 728 F.3d at 683 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C)(iii), (2)(D) ). See also Chapman v. First Index, Inc. , 796 F.3d 783, 784 (7th Cir. 2015) (TCPA "establishes some simple rules that many fax senders ignore ... [including] that commercial faxes include inst......
-
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
...v. ACT, Inc., 798 F.3d 46, 52 (C.A.1 2015) ; Hooks v. Landmark Industries, Inc., 797 F.3d 309, 315 (C.A.5 2015) ; Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (C.A.7 2015) ; Tanasi v. New Alliance Bank, 786 F.3d 195, 200 (C.A.2 2015) ; Stein v. Buccaneers Limited Partnership, 772 F.3d 69......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Supreme Court Rules That An Unaccepted Offer Of Judgment Cannot Moot A Case, But What About Payment Of Complete Relief?
...Inc., 798 F.3d 46, 52 (1st Cir. 2015); Hooks v. Landmark Indus., Inc., 797 F.3d 309, 315 (5th Cir. 2015); Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015); Tanasi v. New Alliance Bank, 786 F.3d 195, 200 (2d Cir. 2015); Stein v. Buccaneers Ltd. Partnership, 772 F.3d 698, 703 (......
-
Supreme Court Short-Circuits Defense Strategy To Pick Off Class Rep
...564, 567 (6th Cir. 2013). [3] Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891, 893 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled by Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought ab......
2 books & journal articles
-
Resolution Without Trial
...F.3d 46, 51–52 (1st Cir. 2015); Hooks v. Landmark Industries, Inc ., 797 F.3d 309, 314–315 (5th Cir. 2015); Chapman v. First Index, Inc ., 796 F.3d 783, 786–787 (7th Cir. 2015); Tanasi v. New Alliance Bank , 786 F.3d 195, 199–200 (2nd Cir. 2015); Stein v. Buccaneers Limited Partnership , 77......
-
What Are Courts For? Have We Forsaken the Procedural Gold Standard?
...is another of the surprisingly many junk-fax suits under . . . the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.” Chapman v. All Am. Painting, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 784 (7th Cir. 2015) (Easterbrook, C.J.). See generally Marcus, Bending in the Breeze, supra note 45, at 520–30. 804 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW [V......