Chapman v. Gooden
Citation | 974 So.2d 972 |
Decision Date | 01 June 2007 |
Docket Number | 1051712. |
Parties | Beth CHAPMAN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Alabama, et al. v. Richard GOODEN and Angela Thomas, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Secretary of State Beth Chapman,1 Jefferson County Registrar Nell Hunter, and the State of Alabama (collectively "the defendants") appeal from a judgment in favor of Richard Gooden and Angela Thomas, as class representatives in a putative class action involving the voting rights of convicted felons. We reverse the judgment in part and dismiss the appeal in part.
In June 1996, the citizens of Alabama ratified Amendment No. 579 to Ala. Const. 1901, § 177. As amended, § 177 provides, in pertinent part:
(Emphasis added.)
On March 18, 2005, Attorney General Troy King issued an opinion in response to questions posed to him by William C. Segrest, then executive director of the Board of Pardons and Paroles (Op. Att'y Gen. 2005-092). Those questions, among others, in the order in which we think they apply here, were: (1) "If an individual has been convicted solely of [a felony not involving moral turpitude], does he or she remain eligible to vote?" (2) "Is an individual eligible under section 15-22-36.1 of the Code of Alabama to apply to the Pardons and Paroles Board for certification for eligibility to vote if he or she has not committed a crime involving moral turpitude?" and (3) "What specific felonies do not include moral turpitude?"
The opinion answered question one in the affirmative and question two in the negative. With regard to question two, it said: "If a person has been convicted of a felony that does not involve moral turpitude, that person remains eligible to vote and is therefore ineligible to apply for a Certificate of Eligibility to Register to vote."
With regard to question three, the opinion stated, in pertinent part:
Op. Att'y Gen. 2005-092, pp. 3-4. On May 27, 2005, then Secretary of State Nancy Worley notified Hunter and every other voter registrar in the State that she was seeking advice from the attorney general regarding which felonies were disfranchising.
On September 29, 2005, Gooden filed a complaint in the Jefferson Circuit Court styled "complaint for declaratory judgment, temporary restraining order, mandatory injunction, and writ of mandamus." Naming Nell Hunter and then Secretary of State Nancy Worley as defendants, Gooden alleged that he "was registered to vote from the mid-1960s until 2000, when he was convicted of felony driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), and [was] told by the State of Alabama that his voting rights were revoked." More specifically, the complaint alleged, in pertinent part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lynch LLC v. Putnam County
... ... Wash. L.Rev. at 563-64, 569-70 ... 23. See, e.g., Chapman v. Gooden, 974 So.2d 972, 989 (Ala.2007); Phibro Res. Corp. v. State, 579 So.2d 118, 126 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1991); Filliung v. Adams, 387 ... ...
-
Thompson v. State
... ... ( See Compl. 2430, 3235); see generally Chapman v. Gooden , 974 So.2d 972, 976 (Ala. 2007) (recounting the Alabama Attorney General's 2005 opinion listing crimes that the Alabama courts have ... ...
-
Ex Parte State Et Al.(in Re Governor Bob Riley Et Al. v. Cornerstone Cmty. Outreach Inc.
... ... other than the Attorney General, would fly in the face of authorities such as [[57 So.3d 713] Ex parte Weaver, 570 So.2d 675 (Ala.1990), Chapman v. Gooden, 974 So.2d 972 (Ala.2007),] and the above-referenced statutes conveying broad powers to the Attorney General over litigation involving the ... ...
-
Harris v. State
... ... Jones, 252 Ala. 479, 484, 41 So.2d 280, 284 (1949)) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ala. Code 1975, § 36-15-21." ... Chapman v. Gooden, 974 So.2d 972, 988 (Ala.2007). As the State's elected chief prosecutor, Mr. King was entitled to argue the State's position during ... ...