Charles Alexander v. the Mayor and Commonalty of Alexandria
Decision Date | 01 February 1809 |
Citation | 3 L.Ed. 19,5 Cranch 1,9 U.S. 1 |
Parties | CHARLES ALEXANDER v. THE MAYOR AND COMMONALTY OF ALEXANDRIA |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial27 cases
-
Pitch v. United States, No. 17-15016
...23 L.Ed.2d 371 (1969) (describing this proposition as a "venerable" principle and citing in support Alexander v. Mayor & Commonalty of Alexandria , 9 U.S. 5 Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 19 (1809) ; United States v. Freeman , 44 U.S. (3 How.) 556, 11 L.Ed. 724 (1845) ; Stockdale v. Ins. Cos. , 87 U.S. ......
-
Red Lion Broadcasting Co v. Federal Communications Commission United States v. Radio Television News Directors Association
...Harlan, joined by Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart). This principle is a venerable one. Alexander v. Mayor and Commonalty of Alexandria, 5 Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 19 (1809); United States v. Freeman, 3 How. 556, 11 L.Ed. 724 (1845); Stockdale v. Insurance Companies, 20 Wall. 323, 22 L.......
-
Jordan v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
...into the foregoing act, is a direction to courts in expounding the provisions of the law." Chief Justice Marshall, in Alexander v. Alexandria, 5 Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 19.66 H.R.Rep. No. 880 (Part I), 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 9 (1976), (1976) U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, pp. 2183, 2191 (emphasis add......
-
Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms
...into the foregoing act, is a direction to courts in expounding the provisions of the law." Alexander v. Alexandria, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 1, 7, 3 L.Ed. 19 (1809) (Marshall, C. J.). Judge Mikva's response is that Exemption 2 of the Sunshine Act is unhelpful because its language "is invoked in en......
Request a trial to view additional results