Charles Hunnicutt Co. v. a B. Gaston Co.

• Decision Date: 30 November 1914
• Docket Number: 1842.
• Citation: Charles Hunnicutt Co. v. a B. Gaston Co., 218 F. 176 (3rd Cir. 1914)
• Parties: CHARLES HUNNICUTT CO. v. A. B. GASTON CO. et al.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

218 F. 176

CHARLES HUNNICUTT CO. v. A. B. GASTON CO. et al.

No. 1842.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

November 30, 1914

H. A Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio, for appellant.

H. C Lord, of Erie, Pa., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, McPHERSON, and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges.

J. B McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.

The opinion of the District Court in this case was delivered by the late Judge Young, and is reported in 207 Fed.at page 585.We agree with his satisfactory treatment of the questions discussed, and shall only add a few words in reference to the unpatented Kretchmer device.

The patent in suit-- for 'a portable and manually operable corn-grading device for grading seed corn'-- was applied for by Charles Hunnicutt on April 20, 1908, and of course this is the prima facie date of the invention.A previous manufacture and public use by Kretchmer having been set up as a defense, the Gaston Company was bound to fix the earlier date by evidence that should convince the mind beyond reasonable doubt.Cantrell v. Wallick,117 U.S. 689, 6 Sup.Ct. 970, 29 L.Ed. 1017.After reading and considering the record on this subject, we are of opinion that the burden thus imposed was successfully maintained, and that one date for such use has been certainly fixed in November, 1907-- this, indeed, is not denied-- and another date has been fixed in February or March, 1906, with a sufficient degree of probability.If for the moment we disregard the date in 1906, the date in 1907 is also earlier than the application, and shifts the burden of proof to Hunnicutt, requiring him to carry back his invention to a time before these November sales.And the evidence to overcome the Kretchmer date in November must at least be strong and convincing.Some cases hold that its quality must be as high as the quality required to establish an anticipating...