Charles Scott, Bailiff of William Moore, Plaintiff In Error v. John Lloyd
Decision Date | 01 January 1835 |
Citation | 9 L.Ed. 178,9 Pet. 418,34 U.S. 418 |
Parties | CHARLES SCOTT, BAILIFF OF WILLIAM S. MOORE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. JOHN LLOYD |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
IN error to the circuit court of the United States for the county of Washington, in the District of Columbia.
An action of replevin was instituted in March 1825, by John Lloyd, in the circuit court of the United States for the county of Alexandria, against Charles Scott, bailiff of William S. Moore; and a declaration was filed in the common form, at September rules of the same year. In November 1827, the defendant filed the following avowry.
'And afterwards, that is to say, on the 29th day of October, in the year 1816, at the county aforesaid, the said Jonathan Scholfield and Eleanor, his wife, by their certain deed of bargain and sale, under their seals, dated on the day and year last mentioned, bargained, sold, and conveyed to the said John Lloyd, his heirs and assigns for ever, certain tenements and lots of ground, in the said town of Alexandria, whereof the said four brick tenements and lot of ground before mentioned, including the said place where, &c., is and was parcel, subject by the terms of the said deed to the payment of the said annuity or rent of 500 dollars to the said William S. Moore, his heirs and assigns, under, and in virtue of which said bargain, sale and conveyance to him, the said John entered upon the said tenements and lots of ground so to him bargained, sold, and conveyed, of which the said place where, &c., is, and was parcel, and became thereof seised and possessed, that is to say, on the said 29th day of October, in the year 1816, at the county aforesaid, and ever since has continued, and yet is so seised and possessed; and became, after the said bargain, sale, and conveyance, to the said plaintiff as aforesaid, and after his entry, seisin, and possession of the premises, including the said place where, &c. and whilst he so continued seised and possessed as aforesaid, the sum of 250 dollars of the annuity or rent aforesaid, for the half year ending on the 10th day of June, in the year 1824; and the further sum of 250 dollars of the said annuity or rent, for the half year ending on the 10th day of December, in the year 1824, became and remained in arrear and unpaid to the said William S. Moore, he, the said Charles Scott, as bailiff of the said William, and by his command and authority at the said time when, &c., entered on the said place where, &c., being parcel of the said four brick tenements and lot of ground, so as aforesaid charged, with the said annuity or rent, and liable to the distress of the said William, and took and carried away the said goods and chattels in the declaration mentioned, then and there being found in the said place where, &c., parcel of the said four tenements and lot of ground, as a distress for the said rent so in arrear as aforesaid, to the said William, as he lawfully might, and this he is ready to verify, &c.: wherefore the said Charles prays judgment for the sum of 1000 dollars, being double the value of the said rent so in arrear and distrained for as aforesaid, with full costs of suit, &c., according to the statute in that case provided.
'The plaintiff's attorney thereupon filed four several pleas, the first of which was:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Missouri & North Arkansas Railroad Company v. Bratton
...asked where substantially the same instruction has been given. 52 Ark. 181; 34 Ark. 651; 51 Ark. 147; 46 Ark. 152; 28 Ark. 9; 6 Pet. 622; 9 Pet. 418; 43 Ark. 185; Ark. 58; 67 Ark. 531. The objection to the second instruction is not well taken. If appellant's employees discovered deceased on......
-
State ex rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp., 33943
...public policy of the state.' See, also, Cheney v. Eberhardt, 8 Neb. 423, 1 N.W. 197; 55 Am.Jur., Usury, s. 14, p. 332; Scott v. Lloyd, 9 Pet. 418, 34 U.S. 418, 9 L.Ed. 178. In Simpson v. Penn Discount Corp., 335 Pa. 172, 5 A.2d 796, 798, the court said: 'As usury is generally accompanied by......
-
France v. Munro
...which the usurer is alleged to have entered. Seekel v. Norman, 71 Iowa, 264, 32 N. W. 334;Train v. Collins, 2 Pick. 145;Scott v. Lloyd, 9 Pet. (U. S.) 418, 9 L. Ed. 178. Says the Minnesota court: “All that is required to establish a case of usury is a fair preponderance of the evidence, and......
-
France v. Munro
...into which the usurer is alleged to have entered. Seekel v. Norman, 71 Iowa 264, 32 N.W. 334; Train v. Collins, 2 Pick. 145; Scott v. Lloyd, 34 U.S. 418, 9 Pet. U.S. 418 L.Ed. 178). Says the Minnesota court: "All that is required to establish a case of usury is a fair preponderance of the e......
-
Brewing Disharmony: Addressing Tribal Sovereign Immunity Claims in Bankruptcy.
...form, and examining into the real nature of the transaction. If that be in fact a loan, no shift or device will protect it. Scott V Lloyd, 34 U.S. 418, 446-47 (1835); see also 12 U.S.C. [section] 38 (123) Kimball v. Nat'l Bank of North America, N. A., 468 F. Supp. 1069, 1071 (D.C.N.Y., 1979......