Charles Scribner v. Isidor Straus No 204 Charles Scribner Sons, Incorporated v. Isidor Straus No 205

Decision Date01 June 1908
Docket NumberNos. 204,205,s. 204
Citation210 U.S. 352,28 S.Ct. 735,52 L.Ed. 1094
PartiesCHARLES SCRIBNER and Arthur H. Scribner, Trading as Charles Scribner's Sons, Appts., v. ISIDOR STRAUS and Nathan Straus, Individually and as Copartners, Trading under the Firm of R. H. Macy & Company. NO 204. CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS, INCORPORATED, Appt., v. ISIDOR STRAUS and Nathan Straus, Individually and as Copartners, Trading under the Name of R. H. Macy & Company. NO 205
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. Stephen H. Olin and Messrs. Olin, Clark, & Phelps for appellants.

Messrs. John G. Carlisle and Edmond E. Wise for appellees.

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

These actions were submitted at the same time and admittedly involve the same questions of law. The suits were brought, the one by a partnership, as Charles Schribner's Sons and the other by a corporation, Charles Scribner's Sons, Incorporated, against R. H. Macy & Company, to restrain the selling at retail of the complainants' books, copyrighted under the laws of the United States, at prices less than those fixed by complainants, and from buying such copyrighted books except under the rules and regulations of the American Publishers' Association. The learned counsel for the appellants in this case, by consent, filed a brief in the case of Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, No. 176 (just decided), 210 U. S. 339, 52 L. ed. ——, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 722. So far as the same questions are involved, the decision in No. 176 is pertinent to this case, and these cases are controlled by the rulings made in that case.

The defendants carried on a department store. Among other things, they sold books at retail,—some copyrighted and some not. In the year 1901 the American Publishers' Association was formed among certain publishers of copyrighted books, and in their agreement is found the following:

'3. That the members of the association agree that such net copyrighted books, and all others of their books, shall be sold by them to those booksellers only who will maintain the retail price of such net copyrighted books for one year, and to those booksellers and jobbers only who will sell their books further to no one known to them to cut such net prices, or whose name has been given to them by the association as one who cuts such prices, or who fails to abide by such fair and reasonable rules and regulations as may be established by local associations, as hereinafter provided.'

Scribner's Sons' catalogue, invoices, and bill of goods contained the following notice:

'Copyrighted net books published after May 1, 1901, and copyrighted fiction published after February 1, 1902, are sold on condition that prices be maintained as provided by the regulations of the American Publishers' Association.'

In the case of a new publisher, notice was given by correspondence and by sending a blank, as follows:

American Publishers' Association.

_____ ___, 190_.

In consideration of discount allowed on books bought from _____ _____ we hereby agree that for one year from date of publication we will not sell net books at less than the retail prices fixed by the respective publishers, nor fiction published after February 1,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Molnar v. National Broadcasting Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • January 4, 1956
    ...447, 77 L.Ed. 903 (1933); Hooe v. United States, 218 U.S. 322, 335-336 31 S.Ct. 85, 54 L.Ed. 1055 (1910); Scribner v. Straus, 210 U.S. 352 28 S.Ct. 735, 52 L.Ed. 1094 (1908); Wade v. Lawder, 165 U.S. 624 17 S.Ct. 425, 41 L.Ed. 851 (1897); Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U.S. 46 8 S.Ct. 756......
  • Republic Pictures Corp. v. Security-First Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 11, 1952
    ...of copyright assignments or contractual rights based thereon do not give rise to federal jurisdiction. Scribner v. Straus, 1908, 210 U.S. 352, 28 S.Ct. 735, 52 L.Ed. 1094; Wells v. Universal Pictures Co., 2 Cir., 1948, 166 F.2d 690; Meredith v. Smith, 9 Cir., 1944, 145 F. 2d 620; Danks v. G......
  • Buck v. Salle Realty Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • April 13, 1931
    ...of the copy and the purchaser which might make the latter liable as a contributory infringer. Compare Scribner v. Straus, 210 U. S. 352, 355, 28 S. Ct. 735, 52 L. Ed. 1094. In the case at bar, the stipulated facts show that there was no relation whatever between the broadcaster and the hote......
  • Hixson v. Hixson, Civ. No. 1047-57.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • January 21, 1958
    ...34 S.Ct. 724, 58 L.Ed. 1218; Hooe v. United States, 1910, 218 U.S. 322, 335-336, 31 S.Ct. 85, 54 L.Ed. 1055; Scribner v. Straus, 1908, 210 U.S. 352, 28 S.Ct. 735, 52 L.Ed. 1094; Wade v. Lawder, 1897, 165 U.S. 624, 17 S.Ct. 425, 41 L.Ed. 851; Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 1888, 125 U.S. 46, 8......
1 books & journal articles
  • The Image Theory: RPM and the Allure of High Prices
    • United States
    • Antitrust Bulletin No. 55-2, June 2010
    • June 1, 2010
    ...schemes may correct the retail freeriding problem).66 See, e.g., Straus v. Am. Publisher’s Ass’n, 231 U.S. 222 (1913); Scribnerv. Straus, 210 U.S. 352 (1908); Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, 210 U.S. 339 (1908);Bittlingmayer, supra note 64. 67 Trust Legislation: Hearings Before the H. Comm. on......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT