Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., No. 1126
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 483 F.2d 953 |
| Decision Date | 30 August 1973 |
| Docket Number | Docket 73-2022.,No. 1126 |
| Parties | CHARLIE'S GIRLS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REVLON, INC., Defendant-Appellant. |
483 F.2d 953 (1973)
CHARLIE'S GIRLS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
REVLON, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 1126, Docket 73-2022.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued August 15, 1973.
Decided August 30, 1973.
Gerald W. Griffin, New York City (R. Bradlee Boal, Norman H. Zivin, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.
Joseph D. Garon, New York City (James N. Buckner, Peter D. Murray, Frederick P. Houston, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before MULLIGAN, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We hereby reverse the order of the district court dated July 3, 1973, temporarily restraining appellant, Revlon, Inc., from the use of the trademark "Charlie" for fragrance. This case is set down for trial before Judge Motley to commence September 17, 1973.
One moving for a preliminary injunction assumes the burden of demonstrating either a combination of probable success and the possibility of irreparable injury or that serious questions are raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in his favor. Stark v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 466 F.2d 743, 744 (2d Cir. 1972); Checker Motors Corp. v. Chrysler Corp., 405 F.2d 319, 323 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 999, 89 S.Ct. 1595, 22 L.Ed.2d 777 (1969). See also Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., 476 F.2d 687, 692-693 (2d Cir. 1973). Here appellee has failed to show either irreparable harm or that the balance of hardships tips decidedly in its favor. It appears both from the record and was necessarily conceded on argument by appellee that its sale of young women's clothing under the registered mark "Charlie's Girls" or any other mark in its alleged "family" of "Charlie's" marks will in no way be affected, at least prior to trial, by the expensive advertising campaign contemplated by appellant in anticipation of Christmas sales of its fragrance "Charlie." This is especially true in light of Revlon's evident financial responsibility to respond in damages, if any will have occurred.
In so holding we in no way express or intimate any views on "the probability of success" of appellee at trial, or on the views of the district judges with respect
to that issue expressed in granting a preliminary injunction and in denying a stay pending appeal.Judgment reversed and cause remanded for trial on the merits.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johanna Farms, Inc. v. Citrus Bowl, Inc., No. 78 C 286.
...determining the propriety of issuing a preliminary injunction in a trademark infringement case. See Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 483 F.2d 953, 954 (2d Cir. 1973); Menley & James Laboratories, Ltd. v. Approved Pharmaceutical Corp., 438 F.Supp. 1061, 1066 (N.D.N.Y. 1977). In a trade......
-
Cobb Coin v. UNIDENT., WRECKED & ABAN. SAIL. VESSEL, No. 79-8266-Civ-JLK.
...(D.C.Cir.1977); City of Palo Alto v. City & County of San Francisco, 548 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1977); Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 483 F.2d 953 (2d Cir. 1973). Certainly, the questions on the merits are substantial enough to require the State to desist in enforcing a criminal statut......
-
National Aviation v. City of Hayward, Cal., No. C-75-2279 RFP.
...Wm. Inglis & Sons Baking v. I.T.T. Cont. Baking Co., 526 F.2d 86, 88 (9th Cir. 1975) quoting from Charlie's Girls Inc. v. Revlon Inc., 483 F.2d 953, 954 (2d Cir. 1973) (emphasis added by Ninth Circuit). Since it is clear that the balance of the parties' relative hardships does not tip sharp......
-
Perez v. Valley Garlic, Inc., CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01156-AWI-EPG
...upon a showing of "probable success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury." E.g., Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 483 F.2d 953, 954 (2nd Cir. 1973). The Second Circuit expressly parted from that standard in New York v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 550 F.2d 745, 75......
-
Martin v. International Olympic Committee, 84-5859
...and the balance of hardships tips sharply in his favor." Id. at 88 (emphasis in original), quoting Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 483 F.2d 953, 954 (2d Cir.1973). Under this last part of the alternative test, even if the balance of hardships tips decidedly in favor of the moving par......
-
National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Walters, C-83-1861-MHP.
...Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co., Inc., 526 F.2d 86, 88 (9th Cir.1976) (emphasis omitted), quoting Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 483 F.2d 953, 954 (2d Cir.1973). While, as demonstrated below, plaintiffs are entitled to injunctive relief under either standard, this court will tailo......
-
Roland Machinery Co. v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 84-1509
...injury") (footnote omitted). A variant of this "sliding scale" approach is illustrated by Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 483 F.2d 953, 954 (2d Cir.1973) (per curiam): "One moving for a preliminary injunction assumes the burden of demonstrating either a combination of probable succes......
-
Johanna Farms, Inc. v. Citrus Bowl, Inc., 78 C 286.
...determining the propriety of issuing a preliminary injunction in a trademark infringement case. See Charlie's Girls, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 483 F.2d 953, 954 (2d Cir. 1973); Menley & James Laboratories, Ltd. v. Approved Pharmaceutical Corp., 438 F.Supp. 1061, 1066 (N.D.N.Y. 1977). In a trade......