Charter Township of Meridian v. Roberts, Docket No. 55351
| Decision Date | 23 September 1982 |
| Docket Number | Docket No. 55351 |
| Citation | 324 N.W.2d 339 |
| Parties | CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF MERIDIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David M. ROBERTS, d/b/a Custom Cablevision, and Nemoke Cablevision, Louis J. Eyde, d/b/a East Lansing Management Company, and George F. Eyde and Louis J. Eyde, d/b/a Eyde Construction Company, a Michigan co-partnership, Defendants-Appellees. 324 N.W.2d 339 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
ORDER
In this cause, an application for rehearing is filed by defendants-appellees, and an answer in opposition thereto having been filed, and due consideration thereof having been had by the Court,
IT IS ORDERED that the application be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED. The opinion, 114 Mich.App. 803, 319 N.W.2d 678, is amended to add the following language immediately before the final paragraph ("Reversed.") on page 319 N.W.2d at 683:
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Carlson v. Village of Union City, Mich.
...Court of Appeals has specifically held that it is. Meridian Township v. Roberts, 114 Mich.App. 803, 319 N.W.2d 678, amended, ___ Mich.App. ___, 324 N.W.2d 339 (1982). This Court will defer to the state court's interpretation of its own constitution. See Community Communications Co. v. City ......
-
Mich. Concrete Ass'n v. Dep't of Transp.
...107; 44 N.W.2d 892 (1950), and Meridian Charter Twp v Roberts, 114 Mich.App. 803; 319 N.W.2d 678 (1982), amended on other grounds 324 N.W.2d 339 (1982). Those three cases, stand for the proposition that governmental authorities may obtain injunctive relief to prevent violations of criminal ......