Chassin v. Helaire Nursing Agency, Inc.

• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
• Writing for the Court: Before SULLIVAN
• Citation: Chassin v. Helaire Nursing Agency, Inc., 621 N.Y.S.2d 611, 211 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
• Decision Date: 26 January 1995
• Parties: In re Application of Mark CHASSIN, M.D., etc., Petitioner-Respondent, For an Order, etc., v. HELAIRE NURSING AGENCY, INC., Respondent-Appellant.

Page 611

621 N.Y.S.2d 611

211 A.D.2d 581

In re Application of Mark CHASSIN, M.D., etc., Petitioner-Respondent For an Order, etc., v. HELAIRE NURSING AGENCY, INC., Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Department.

Jan. 26, 1995.

J. Graber, New York City, for petitioner-respondent.

W.P. Holm, New York City, for respondent-appellant.

Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and ELLERIN, KUPFERMAN and WILLIAMS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered July 25, 1994, which directed respondent Helaire Nursing Agency, Inc. to comply with petitioner's subpoena duces tecum and provide to petitioner copies of certain documents described in the subpoena, or permit such documents to be examined by petitioner at respondent's office, and denying respondent's cross-motion to quash the subpoena, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner's preliminary investigation established a sufficient factual basis to warrant investigation whether respondent is operating a home care services business without a license (see, Myerson v. Lentini Bros. Moving & Stor. Co., 33 N.Y.2d 250, 351 N.Y.S.2d 687, 306 N.E.2d 804). Public Health Law...