Chatman v. Strafford County
| Docket Number | 2011-162 |
| Decision Date | 09 March 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Reid v. N.H. Attorney Gen.
...jointly with Rockingham County." "Because we decide cases on constitutional grounds only when necessary," Chatman v. Strafford County, 163 N.H. 320, 322, 42 A.3d 853 (2012), we will first address the plaintiff's second argument, which raises an issue of statutory interpretation.The interpre......
-
Union Leader Corp. v. Town of Salem
...Because we decide this case on statutory grounds, we do not reach the plaintiffs’ constitutional argument. See Chatman v. Strafford County, 163 N.H. 320, 322, 42 A.3d 853 (2012) (explaining that "we decide cases on constitutional grounds only when necessary").1 A. Standard of Review When in......
-
Lamb v. Shaker Reg'l Sch. Dist.
...with our prior holdings interpreting the motor vehicle exception to immunity pursuant to RSA 507–B:2. In Chatman v. Strafford County, 163 N.H. 320, 42 A.3d 853 (2012), we recognized that "when a vehicle acts as merely the situs of an injury, the causal connection between the injury and the ......
-
Hewes v. Belknap Cnty.
...vehicle," or, "a causal connection must exist between the resulting harm and the [operation or] use of the vehicle." Chatman v. Strafford County, 163 N.H. 320, 323 (2012) (quoting Concord Gen. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Doe, 161 N.H. 73, 76 (2010)). "[A]lthough proximate causation is not required, 'a......
Get Started for Free