Chemical Nat Bank of Chicago v. Hartford Deposit Co
Decision Date | 03 February 1896 |
Docket Number | No. 735,735 |
Citation | 40 L.Ed. 595,161 U.S. 1,16 S.Ct. 439 |
Parties | CHEMICAL NAT. BANK OF CHICAGO v. HARTFORD DEPOSIT CO |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
This was an action of assumpsit brought by the Hartford Deposit Company against the Chemical National Bank of Chicago and the receiver of the bank in the superior court of Cook county to recover damages for a failure to pay rent alleged to be due, under a written lease, from August 1, 1893, to April 30, 1894. The cause was submitted to the court for trial on a stipulation as to the facts, of which the lease formed a part. The issues were found in favor of defendants, and judgment was rendered accordingly. Plaintiff took the case to the appellate court for the First district of Illinois, which affirmed the judgment as to the receiver, but reversed it as to the Chemical National Bank, and entered judgment for the sum of $9,000. 58 Ill. App. 256. An appeal was prosecuted to the supreme court of Illinois, and the judgment of the appellate court affirmed. 156 Ill. 522, 41 M. E. 225. This writ of error was thereupon brought.
The facts were thus stated by the supreme court:
Hiram T. Cilbert, for plaintiff in error.
Charles H. Baldwin, for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.
It is not claimed that the express covenant to pay rent was released by the insolvency of the lessee merely, nor that the election of the receiver not to accept the lease had any effect on the contract between the lessor and the lessee, nor that the lessor had done anything itself to terminate its rights under the lease. But it is argued that no judgment could be rendered against the bank, because the appointment of a receiver amounted to its dissolution, and because the rent in question was not a demand existing at the date of the bank's suspension, and therefore not a claim entitled to be proven up and paid out of the assets of the bank or carried into judgment. The state courts ruled both branches of this contention adversely to plaintiff in error.
Granting that, in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary, suits cannot be maintained and judgments rendered against corporations whose chartered existence has terminated, it is not pretended in this case that that event had taken place by lapse of time, by judicial proceedings, or otherwise, unless, as is insisted, the appointment of a receiver in itself put an end to the bank as a corporate entity.
The general rule is that the legal existence of a corporation cannot be cut short in this way, and we can find nothing in the statutes in relation to insolvent national banks which gives that effect to such an appointment, or justifies any distinction in that regard, as between them and other insolvent corporations.
By section 5136 of the Revised Statutes it is provided that every national bank, duly incorporated, shall have succession for the period of 20 years from its organization, 'unless it is sooner dissolved according to the provisions of its articles of association, or by the act of its shareholders owning two-thirds of its stock, or unless its franchise becomes forfeited by some violation of law.'
A receiver may be appointed upon the occurrence of the particular defaults enumerated in sections 5141, 5151, 5191, 5195, 5201, and 5205, not in question here.
Section 5151 provides, 'The shareholders of every national banking association shall be held individually responsible, equally and ratably, and not one for another, for all contracts, debts, and engagements of such association, to the extent of the amount of their stock therein, at the par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in such shares.'
Sections 5220 and 5221 provide for the voluntary dissolution of these associations, and sections 5226 and 5227 for the pro- test of their circulating notes, on failure to redeem, and the appointment of a special agent to ascertain the fact.
Sections 5228, 5234, 5236, and 5239 are as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Suffolk Knitting Mills
...Bank, 14 Wall. 383, 401, 402, 20 L. Ed. 840;Kennedy v. Gibson, 8 Wall. 498, 506, 19 L. Ed. 476;Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U. S. 7, 16 Sup. Ct. 439, 40 L. Ed. 595;Rankin v. Emigh, 218 U. S. 27, 30 Sup. Ct. 672, 54 L. Ed. 915. The terms of our statute, although follow......
-
Dababneh v. F.D.I.C.
...pay future rent"), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 651, 56 S.Ct. 368, 80 L.Ed. 463 (1935); compare Chemical Nat'l Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U.S. 1, 2, 9-10, 16 S.Ct. 439, 439, 442, 40 L.Ed. 595 (1896) (upholding a claim for future rent against the insolvent bank as an "existing demand" becau......
-
Ames v. Am. Nat. Bank Of Portsmouth
...was the decision of the Connecticut court affirmed in 81 U. S. (14 Wall.) 383, 20 L. Ed. 840, but in Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U. S. 1, 16 S. Ct. 439, 40 L. Ed 595, Mr. Chief Justice Fuller, speaking for the court, cites it, with approval, follows its doctrine, and......
-
Ames v. American Nat. Bank
...court affirmed in 14 Wall. (81 U.S.) 383, 20 L.Ed. 840, but in Chemical National Bank Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U.S. Page 67 1, 16 S.Ct. 439, 40 L.Ed. 595, Mr. Chief Justice Fuller speaking for the court cites it, with approval, follows its doctrine, and characterizes it as "a well consider......