Cheney v. State
| Decision Date | 22 December 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. S,S |
| Citation | 44 Wis.2d 454,174 N.W.2d 1 |
| Parties | Turner H. CHENEY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Wisconsin, Defendant in Error. tate 59. |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
The testimony of the arson investigator that he recovered pipe fragments from the rear of the Allied store was in corroboration of Schmidt's testimony because there was testimony that these fragments were similar to the pipes which Kasik testified were turned over to him by Cheney.
Motion for rehearing denied without costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
30 cases
-
Stockwell v. State
...cases' in which the power to review and modify sentence should be exercised. Cheney v. State (1969), 44 Wis.2d 454, 171 N.W.2d 339, 174 N.W.2d 1. Judgment 1 '939.05 Parties to crime. (1) Whoever is concerned in the commission of a crime is a principal and may be charged with and convicted o......
-
McCleary v. State
...Wis.2d 488, 168 N.W.2d 856; State v. Harling (1969), 44 Wis.2d 266, 170 N.W.2d 720; Cheney v. State (1969), 44 Wis.2d 454, 171 N.W.2d 339, 174 N.W.2d 1. It is thus clear that sentencing is a discretionary judicial act and is reviewable by this court in the same manner that all discretionary......
-
Melby v. State
...by a strong policy against interference with the lower court's discretion. Cheney v. State (1969), 44 Wis.2d 454, 468, 171 N.W.2d 339, 174 N.W.2d 1; Finger v. State (1968), 40 Wis.2d 103, 111, 161 N.W.2d The trial judge must state his reasons for imposing the sentence and this court has tak......
-
State v. Riemenschneider
...years, is somewhat less than the maximum for arson, twenty years. Cf. Cheney v. State, 44 Wis.2d 454, 468-69, 171 N.W.2d 339, 346-47, 174 N.W.2d 1 (1969) (maximum sentence permissible for even a first offender solely on the basis of seriousness of the 11. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL R......
Request a trial to view additional results