Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kan Ry Co
Decision Date | 19 May 1890 |
Citation | 34 L.Ed. 295,135 U.S. 641,10 S.Ct. 965 |
Parties | CHEROKEE NATION v. SOUTHERN KAN. RY. CO |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
J. E. McDonald R. J. Bright, and J. C. Fay, for appellant.
Geo. R. Peck, A. T. Britton, and A. B. Browne, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a decree of the district court of the United States for the e stern district of Arkansas. The litigation between the parties arises out of an act of congress, approved July 4, 1884, entitled 'An act to grant the right of way through the Indian Territory to the Southern Kansas Railway Company, and for other purposes.' 23 St. 73. By the first section of that act the above company was authorized to locate, construct, operate, and maintain a railway, telegraph, and telephone line, through the Indian Territory, beginning at a pointon the northern line of the territory, where an extension of the Southern Kansas Railway from Winfield in a southerly direction would strike that line, running thence south in the direction of Dennison, Tex., on the most practicable route, to a point at or near where the Washita river empties into the Red river, with a branch constructed from a point at or near where the main line crosses the northern line of the territory, westwardly along or near that line to a point at or near where Medicine Lodge creek crosses the northern line of the territory, and from that point in a southwesterly direction, crossing Beaver creek at or near Camp Supply, and reaching the west line of the Indian Territory at or near where Wolf creek crosses the same, with the right to construct, use, and maintain such tracks, turn-outs, and sidings as the company might deem it to their interest to construct along and upon the right of way and depot grounds by that act granted. The second section grants to the company a right of way of a prescribed width through the territory for its main line and branch road, stations, and telegraph and telephone lines, subject to the condition that no part of the lands granted shall be used otherwise than for the company's railroad, telegraph, and telephone lines, and that, if any portion ceases to be so used, it shall revert to the nation or tribe of Indians from which it was taken.
The third section, upon which some of the principal questions in the case depend, is in these words:
The fifth, sixth, and eighth sections are as follows:
'Sec. 5. That said railway company shall pay to the secretary of the interior, for the benefit of the particular nations or tribes through whose lands said mai line and branch may be located, the sum of fifty dollars, in addition to compensation provided for in this act, for property taken and damages done by the construction of the railway, for each mile of railway that it may construct in said territory, said payments to be made in installments of five hundred dollars as each ten miles of road is graded. Said company shall also pay, so long as said territory is owned and occupied by the Indians, to the secretary of the interior, the sum of fifteen dollars per annum for each mile of railway it shall construct in the said territory. The money paid to the secretary of the interior, under the provisions of this act, shall be apportioned by him in accordance with the laws and treaties now in force, among the different nations and tribes, according to the number of miles of railway that may be constructed by said railway company through their lands: provided, that congress shall have thr right, so long as said lands are occupied and possessed by said nations and tribes, to impose such additional taxes upon said railroad as it may deem just and proper for their benefit: provided further, that, if the general council of either of the nations or tribes through whose lands said railway may be located shall within four months after the filing of maps of definite location, as set forth in section six of this act, dissent from the allowances provided for in this section, and shall certify the same to the secretary of the interior, then all compensation to be paid to such dissenting nation or tribe under the provisions of this act shall be determined as provided in section three for the determination of the compensation to be paid to the individual occupant of lands, with the right of appeal to the courts upon the same terms, conditions, and requirements as therein provided: provided further, that the amount awarded or adjudged to be paid by said railway company for said dissenting nation or tribe shall be in lieu of the compensation that said nation or tribe would be entitled to receive under the provisions of this section. Nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit congress from imposing taxes upon said railway, nor any territory or state hereafter formed, through which said railway shall have been established, from exercising the like power as to such part of said railway as may lie within its limits. Said railway company shall have the right to survey and locate its railway immediately after the passage of this act.
The Cherokee Nation having dissented from the allowance provided for in the fifth section of the above act, commissioners were appointed by the president, as provided in the third section. They met at Topeka, Kan., on the 26th of August, 1886, and, having duly qualified according to law, proceeded to the Indian Territory in the discharge of their duties. Their report to the president, made September 25, 1886, states that they inspected the located line of road as it traversed the territory of the Cherokee Nation, with its branch, and that, upon an actual view of the lands proposed to be taken and appropriated for right of way, station grounds, etc., under the act of congress, they found that said nation was entitled to receive as adequate compensation for such lands, and for damages for 35 1/2 miles of the main line, the way, for 35 1/2 miles of the main line, the sum of $93 for each mile, aggregating for the whole distance $3,301.50. They also found and awarded as adequate compensation and damages in respect to the lands to be taken and appropriated for the branch line, 112.54 miles in length, the sum of $36 for each mile, aggregating for the whole distance the sum of $4,051.44. The commissioners ordered that the railway company, within 10...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Crary
...and it thereupon obtains title to the land. Then for the first time is the land "taken." See Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Ry. Co., 135 U. S. 641, 659, 10 S. Ct. 965, 34 L. Ed. 295. It is often difficult to estimate fairly the value of land as of the time when the estimate is made. And......
-
Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Central Stockyards Co.
... ... compelling it to switch and deliver to the Southern Railway ... Company in Kentucky, at points of connection between the ... tracks of the two ... public corporation, and although it operates a public highway ... ( Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway, 135 ... U.S. 641, 10 S.Ct. 965, 34 L.Ed. 295; Lake Shore, ... ...
-
Klein v. City of Louisville
...Brocklin v. Tennessee (Anderson). 117 U.S. 151, 154 (6 S. Ct. 670, 29 L. Ed. 845) and cases cited; Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas R. Co., 135 U.S. 641, 656 (10 S. Ct. 965, 34 L. Ed. 295.) "From these premises, the conclusion appears to be inevitable that, although Congress may, if it se......
-
Northern Securities Company v. United States
...convenience of the people, and therefore are subject to governmental control and regulation.' Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas R. Co. 135 U. S. 641, 657, 34 L. ed. 295, 302, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 965; Chicago, St. L. & N. O. R. Co. v. Pullman Southern Car Co. 139 U. S. 79, 90, 35 L. ed. 97, 10......
-
Surviving Castro-huerta: the Historical Perseverance of the Basic Policy of Worcester v. Georgia Protecting Tribal Autonomy, Notwithstanding One Supreme Court Opinion's Errant Narrative to the Contrary
...commentary denigrating and vilifying Indian nations during the turn-of-the-century period. See, e.g., Cherokee Nation v. S. Kan. Ry. Co., 135 U.S. 641, 653 (1890) ("The proposition that the Cherokee Nation is a sovereign in the sense that the United States is sovereign, or in the sense that......
-
COMPATIBILITY OF THE FEDERAL TRUST RESPONSIBILITY WITH SELF-DETERMINATION OF INDIAN TRIBES: REFLECTIONS ON DEVELOPMENT OF THE FEDERAL TRUST RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY
...States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886); Choctaw Nation v. United States, 119 U.S. 1 (1886); Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas R. Co., 135 U.S. 641, 654-55 (1890); Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 294, 300-05 (1902); Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 553 (1903); Tiger v. Western Investm......
-
CHAPTER 5 RAILROAD RECORDS AND TITLES
...United States, 315 U.S.262 (1942). c. Right of way is a "public highway" or a franchise. Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railroad Co., 135 U.S. 641 (1890); California v. Central Pacific Railroad Co., 127 U.S. 1, 39 (1887). See also Thomas v. West Jersey Railroad Co. 101 U.S. 71 (1880). (......
-
THE FEDERAL TRUST RESPONSIBILITY IN A SELF-DETERMINATION ERA
...the Trust Relationship," at 7-3. [48] 187 U.S. 553, 564 (1903). [49] Id. at 565. [50] See e.g., Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kan. Ry. Co., 135 U.S. 641, 655 (1890) (affirming congressional power to take Indian lands for public use upon payment of compensation); Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock, ......