Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Oil & Gas Comm., NO. 2012-1207

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Ohio
Citation133 Ohio St.3d 1480,978 N.E.2d 205
Docket NumberNO. 2012-1207
PartiesChesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Oil & Gas Comm.
Decision Date14 November 2012

133 Ohio St.3d 1480
978 N.E.2d 205

Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
v.
Oil & Gas Comm.

NO. 2012-1207

Supreme Court of Ohio

November 14, 2012



MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of respondents' motion for leave to argue lack of standing in their merit brief, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Oil & Gas Comm'n, No. 2012–1207.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • January 30, 2013
    ...1408, 2012-Ohio-4650, 975 N.E.2d 1027. We later denied respondents' motion for leave to argue lack of standing in their merit brief. 133 Ohio St.3d 1480, 2012-Ohio-5246, 978 N.E.2d 205.1 {¶ 8} This cause is now before the court for our consideration of the merits.Analysis {¶ 9} To be entitl......
1 cases
  • Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Oil & Gas Comm'n, No. 2012–1207.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • January 30, 2013
    ...1408, 2012-Ohio-4650, 975 N.E.2d 1027. We later denied respondents' motion for leave to argue lack of standing in their merit brief. 133 Ohio St.3d 1480, 2012-Ohio-5246, 978 N.E.2d 205.1 {¶ 8} This cause is now before the court for our consideration of the merits.Analysis {¶ 9} To be entitl......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT