Chi. & N. W. Ry. Co. Chi. & N. W. Ry. v. Union Lime Co.

Decision Date11 March 1913
Citation140 N.W. 346,152 Wis. 633
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
PartiesIN RE CHICAGO & N. W. RY. CO. CHICAGO & N. W. RY. CO. (EDEN INDEPENDENT LIME & STONE CO., INTERVENER) v. UNION LIME CO.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Fond du Lac County; Chester A. Fowler, Judge.

Application of Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company to condemn certain real property in Fond du Lac county for a spur track right of way against the Union Lime Company, in which the Eden Independent Lime & Stone Company intervenes. Judgment for petitioner, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

This is an appeal by the Union Lime Company from the order of the circuit court appointing commissioners to ascertain and appraise the compensation to be made to the owners of real estate which it is sought to take to build a spur track as part of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company's spur tracks at the place therein designated and described.Lines, Spooner, Ellis & Quarles, of Milwaukee, for appellant.

Edward M. Smart, of Milwaukee, for respondent Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

L. E. Lurvey, of Fond du Lac, for intervener.

SIEBECKER, J.

The Nast Bros. Lime & Stone Company and the Union Lime Company are engaged in operating stone quarries and limeworks in section 6, township 14 N., range 18 E., in Fond du Lac county. The Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company is the owner of and is operating a spur track, with branches, switches, and sidings from its main line, through section 5 of the town and range mentioned above. This spur track terminates where it serves the business and interests of the Union Lime Company. A map of the location of the properties of the parties and the existing railroad tracks is made a part of the record, and is as follows:

IMAGE

The Eden Independent Lime & Stone Company is the owner of premises, quarries, plants, buildings, limekilns, etc., in section 6.

Some time prior to June 30, 1911, the Eden Independent Lime & Stone Company petitioned the Railroad Commission of Wisconsin that the railway company be ordered and required to construct a spur track to its premises from the terminus of the spur track on the premises of the Union Lime Company. The Commission made the following order upon the petition: “It is therefore ordered that the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company construct a suitable side track as prayed for by the petitioner herein, along the route designated by the blue print attached to the original petition, which side track shall be an extension of the railway company's track marked ‘D’ on said blue print. It is further ordered that the petitioner herein deposit with the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company the sum of one thousand six hundred and sixty dollars ($1,660), the estimated cost of the proposed extension, and, in addition thereto, the sum of two hundred dollars ($200) to cover the portion of the right of way which has to be acquired by condemnation or otherwise, and also give the railroad company a bond, to be approved by the Commission as to form, amount, and surety, securing the railroad against loss on account of any expense incurred beyond the amount of the deposit with the railroad. Sixty days is deemed a reasonable period of time within which to comply with the provisions of this order. If for any valid reason compliance with the order cannot be made within such time, the Commission will extend the same upon application.”...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State ex rel. Railroad Co. v. Publ. Serv. Comm.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 8, 1930
    ...Co. v. Coal Mining Co., 151 Mo. 288; Union Lime Co. v. Railway Co., 233 U.S. 222; Lime Co. v. Railroad Commrs., 144 Wis. 523; Railway Co. v. Lime Co., 152 Wis. 633. (7) The grant by the city to the Sheffield Steel Corporation to cross the public streets of the city, constitutes a franchise,......
  • State ex rel. and to Use of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Public Service Com'n
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 8, 1930
    ... ... 10425, R. S. 1919; ... Railroad Co. v. Coal Co., 161 Mo. 288; Union ... Lime Co. v. Ry. Co., 233 U.S. 222. (3) A 146-foot right ... of way ... ...
  • Menasha Woodenware Co. v. R.R. Comm'n of Wis.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1918
    ...domain thereunder can be asserted. This was the precise ground on which the case decided by this court of C. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Union Lime Co., 152 Wis. 633, 140 N. W. 346, was affirmed in the same case on appeal to the United States Supreme Court in 233 U. S. 211, 34 Sup. Ct. 522, 58 L. Ed......
  • Richards v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 8, 1922
    ... ... Murdock, 42 Mo. 279; Brown v. Ry ... Co., 137 Mo. 529; Union Line Co. v. Railway, ... 233 U.S. 211-222; Railroad Co. v. Coal Co., 161 ... Coal Ry. Co. v. Coal & Mining ... Co., 161 Mo. 288; Lime Co. v. Ry. Co., 233 U.S ... 222; State ex rel. v. St. Louis, 145 Mo ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT