Chicago & Alton R.R. Co. v. Garvy

Decision Date31 January 1871
CitationChicago & Alton R.R. Co. v. Garvy, 58 Ill. 83, 1871 WL 7866 (Ill. 1871)
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
PartiesCHICAGO & ALTON RAILROAD COMPANYv.MARY GARVY, ADM'X, ETC.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. JOHN M. SCOTT, Judge, presiding.

Mr. A. W. CHURCH and Messrs. WILLIAMS & BURR, for the appellant.

Messrs. STEVENSON & EWING, for the appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE THORNTONdelivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action on the case, under the statute, for a wrongful killing.

As is usual, in such cases, the evidence was contradictory.

The party was killed on a dark night, at the crossing of a public street, in the city of Bloomington.The company had several tracks crossing the street.

On the night of the accident, two trains were passing,--one going north and one south.

The deceased and two companions started to cross the street, and were hindered by the northern bound train.They stopped to let it pass.Immediately after its passage, they stepped on the track, and all three were knocked down and one was killed.

The cars which caused the death, were detached from the engine, and though running slowly at the time, were under the control of no person.On a dark night in a populous city, and on a public thoroughfare, frequently used, this was great negligence in itself.

The jury were authorized to find, from the evidence in the record, that no signal was given of the approach of the cars; that there were no lights upon them; that there was no brakeman or other employee of the company to warn passengers, or check the speed in case of danger, and that the cars were not attached to any locomotive.

These facts found, would constitute negligence from which the company can not be...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Farris v. Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1909
    ... ... 63; ... French v. Railroad, 116 Mass. 537; Railroad v ... Garvy, 58 Ill. 83; Railroad v. Baches, 55 Ill ... 379. It matters not whether ... ...
  • O'Connor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 20, 1888
    ...Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 326; Railroad v. Machas, 55 Ill. 379; Railroad v. Dignan, 56 Ill. 487; Stillwell v. Railroad, 34 N.Y. 29; Railroad v. Garvey, 58 Ill. 83; Railway Accident Law, 166. (3) The court did not err in giving plaintiff's instruction. It contained a full review of all the mat......
  • Wilson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1906
  • The Lake Erie v. Zoffinger
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 30, 1881
    ...any light, is gross negligence on the part of the railroad company, cited Ill. Cent. R. R. Co. v. Ebert, 74 Ill. 399; C. & A. R. R. Co. v. Garvey, 58 Ill. 83. C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Triplett, 38 Ill. 482; Ill. Cent. R. R. Co. v. Baches, 55 Ill. 379; C. R. I. & P. R. R. Co. v. Dignan, 56 Il......
  • Get Started for Free