Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Williams
Decision Date | 21 October 1912 |
Docket Number | 2,303. |
Parties | CHICAGO, B. & Q. RY. CO. v. WILLIAMS. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
September 26, 1903, Edgar C. Williams and the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company made and entered into a contract, the material parts of which are as follows:
No. of Waybill. Number and Initial of Car. No. of Animals in Each Car.
'This contract, made and entered into this 26th day of Sept., 1903, by and between Ed Williams, of Robertson, of the first part, and the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, of the second part.
'Witnesseth, that for and in consideration of 23 1/2 per cwt., subject to minimum weights as shown in published tariffs, the said railway company agrees to transport 2 cars loaded with cattle (number of cars, number of waybill, and number of animals as noted above), from Robertson to U.S. yds. consigned to Drumm Com. Co.; and the said first party, in consideration thereof, agrees to deliver the said animals, to the said railway company, for transportation between the points aforesaid upon the following terms, viz.:
Each horse or pony (gelding, mare or stallion), mule or jack .. $100.00
Each ox, bull or steer .......................................... 50.00
Each cow ........................................................ 30.00
Each calf ....................................................... 10.00
Each hog ........................................................ 10.00
Each sheep or goat ............................................... 3.00
'When the declared value exceeds the above, an addition of 25 per cent. will be made to the rate for each 100 per cent, or fraction thereof, of additional 'declared valuation per head,' which said alternative rates are fully shown in and upon the regular tariffs and classifications printed, published and posted by the said company as required by law; and
'Whereas, the first party, in order to avail himself of said alternative rates, and to secure the benefit thereof, has declared, and does hereby declare said animals to be of the value as follows, to wit: Each steer, value, $50.00. To which value the rate aforesaid is proportioned by the classifications and tariffs aforesaid:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Powell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
...Ed.), secs. 997, 1073, 1004; Railroad v. Stevens, 95 U.S. 655; Railroad v. Lockwood, a great case, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 357; C. B. and Q. Ry. Co. v. Williams, 200 F. 207; Carroll v. Railroad, 88 Mo. 239; Cherry Railroad, 191 Mo. 517, 518 (we quote infra from the Cherry case); Railroad v. Sout......
- Kirkendall v. Union Pac. R. Co.
-
Hulet v. Payne
... ... Baltimore & O.R. Co. v. McLaughlin, 73 F. 519, 19 ... C.C.A. 551; Kirkendall v. Union Pac. R. Co., 200 F ... 197, 118 C.C.A. 383; Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v ... Williams, 200 F. 207, 118 C.C.A. 393; Tripp v ... Michigan Cent. R. Co., 238 F. 449, 151 C.C.A. 385, ... L.R.A. 1918A, ... ...
-
Norfolk Southern R. Co. v. Chatman
... ... rule is also announced in the cases of Kirkendall v ... Union Pacific Railroad Co., 200 F. 197, 118 C.C.A. 383; ... B. & Q.R.R. v. Williams, 200 F. 207, 18 C.C.A. 393 ... On the ... reverse side of the sheet on which this contract is written ... appears what purports to be a ... ...