Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Gillis, 10050
Decision Date | 07 December 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 10050,10050 |
Citation | 80 S.D. 50,118 N.W.2d 313 |
Parties | CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. Bruce D. GILLIS as Commissioner of Revenue of the State of South Dakota et al., Respondents. |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Dwight Campbell, Aberdeen, for petitioner.
A. C. Miller, Atty. Gen., John P. Dewell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph H. Bottum, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for respondents.
This is an original proceeding in this court.
Petitioner is a Wisconsin railroad corporation. It is a common carrier of persons and property in many midwestern states, including South Dakota, where its trackage and appurtenant operating properties are distributed in and over some 744 taxing districts in 44 counties.
This proceeding is concerned with the valuation and assessment of these operating properties for ad valorem tax by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of South Dakota and in no manner involves railroad property of the nonoperating classification, which is valued by local assessors. The principal point here at issue is the applicability of SDC 1960 Supp. 57.0334 to such operating property. This section as it now stands, was amended by Ch. 459, Laws of 1957, so as to establish a statewide assessment factor of 60% of true and full value of all property, and the sole legal question presented by the pleadings is whether this factor relates to railway operating property.
Petitioner contends that it does, that those of the respondents whose duty it is to establish assessed valuations upon such operating property have unlawfully and unjustly discriminated against petitioner in that they have refused to apply this factor to the true and full value of such property, and that this refusal has caused such property to be valued for taxation higher than other property of the same class owned by individual taxpayers within the state.
To the foregoing, respondents by answer allege, first, that the statutory factor of 60% aforesaid does not relate to railroad operating property and, secondly, that if the court determines otherwise, respondents would demonstrate that the imposition of the factor had, notwithstanding their view, been substantially accomplished, and that the writ would not lie.
The petition asks this court to issue its mandate to the respondents, requiring them to apply the factor of 60% provided by SDC 1960 Supp. 57.0334 to the valuation of petitioner's property and thus to assure an equality of taxation.
The 1962 valuation of petitioner's operating property by the respondent, Gillis, Commissioner of Revenue (legal successor to Director of Taxation) appears to have been initiated in conformity with SDC 57.1305. This section, headed 'Assessment: when and how made' under Ch. 57.13 'RAILROAD COMPANIES', reads as follows:
'The Director of Taxation shall, in determining the true and full value of the property assessed by him, value all the property of any railroad company as a unit, but shall make due allowance for any nonoperating property.
'If any railroad company owns or uses operating property partly within and partly without this state, the Director of Taxation shall determine the value of the entire operating property of such railroad and shall allocate or assign a part of said value to this state by the use of such factors or methods as are reasonable and equitable.'
Commissioner Gillis, according to the stipulation filed herein, took some steps prior to June 18, 1962, to establish a valuation of petitioner's property, and a letter was sent to petitioner on this latter date, advising it that a 'tentative valuation' of $31,100,806 had...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co. v. Gillis
...apply and as to Milwaukee required the Director to apply it and accordingly reduce the taxable value. Chicago M. St. P. & P.R.R. Co. v. Gillis, December 7, 1962, 80 S.D. 50, 118 N.W.2d 313. Under the narrow issues presented in mandamus and the stipulated facts as to the North Western, the c......
-
Appeals of Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.
...within such counties, cities, incorporated towns, civil townships, and lesser taxing districts.' In Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific R.R. Co. v. Gillis, 80 S.D. 50, 118 N.W.2d 313, the state was contending that the operating property of the railroad could be valued for taxation high......
-
Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Gillis
...by the defendants, the Commissioner of Revenue and the State Board of Equalization. In a companion case, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co. v. Gillis, S.D., 118 N.W.2d 313, we held that under the provisions of the statute (SDC 1960 Supp. 57.0334) providing that 'All property shal......
-
Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Gillis
...Bottum, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for respondents. PER CURIAM. This is a companion case to Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company v. Gillis et al., S.D., 118 N.W.2d 313. Application of the principles announced in that case to the fact situation here involved compels ......