Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co., 9066.
| Decision Date | 26 August 1946 |
| Docket Number | No. 9066.,9066. |
| Citation | 156 F.2d 981 |
| Parties | CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO., a Corporation of New Jersey, and Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., a Corporation of Massachusetts, Appellants, v. HUGHES TOOL CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
William F. Hall, of Washington, D.C. (William S. Potter, of Wilmington, Del., and R. G. Mullee, of New York City, on the brief), for appellants.
George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill. (Robert F. Campbell and Lester B. Clark, both of Houston, Tex., and Arthur G. Connolly, of Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges, and KALODNER, District Judge.
Scrutiny of the briefs and appendices and careful consideration of the oral arguments convince us that the court below committed no error in respect to count 3 of the complaint, the only count before us for consideration. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Leahy, 61 F.Supp. 767, 771, 772.
Judge O'CONNELL participated in the consideration and decision of this case but was unable to collaborate in the preparation of the opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of America
...Nemours & Co., D.C.Del. 1944, 56 F. Supp. 871; Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co., D.C.Del.1945, 61 F.Supp. 767, affirmed 3 Cir., 156 F.2d 981; Detroit Lubricator Co. v. Toussaint, D.C.N.D.Ill., 1944, 57 F.Supp. 837, at page 838; Landis Machinery Co. v. Chaso Tool Co., Inc., 6 Ci......
-
Dawson Chemical Company v. Rohm and Haas Company, 79-669
...335 U.S. 859, 69 S.Ct. 132, 93 L.Ed. 405 (1948); Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co., 61 F.Supp. 767, 769 (Del. 1945), aff'd, 156 F.2d 981 (CA3), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 781, 67 S.Ct. 204, 91 L.Ed. 670 (1946); Landis Machinery Co. v. Chaso Tool Co., 141 F.2d 800, 801 (CA6), cert. d......
-
Nolan v. Judicial Council of Third Circuit
...as a substitute for an appeal. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co., 61 F.Supp. 767, 770 (D.Del.1945), aff'd per curiam, 156 F.2d 981 (3 Cir. 1946), cert. den. 329 U.S. 781, 67 S.Ct. 204, 91 L.Ed. 670 (1946). Nor should a judge sitting in the same district court review in such a su......
-
Baier v. Parker
...by state or federal courts may be reexamined. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co., 61 F.Supp. 767 (D.Del.1945), affirmed, 156 F.2d 981 (3 Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 781, 67 S.Ct. 204, 91 L.Ed. 670 (1946); Shannon v. Sequeechi, 365 F.2d 827 (10 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386......