Chicago & A.R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Citation | 173 F. 930 |
Decision Date | 29 June 1908 |
Docket Number | 29,116.,29,115 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Parties | CHICAGO & A.R. CO. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. v. SAME. |
Winston Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for complainant Chicago & A. R. Co.
J. M Dickinson and W. S. Kenyon, for complainant Illinois Cent. R. Co.
L. A Shaver, for defendant.
These causes are substantially alike and were submitted together for final decree upon bill and answer.
Complainants are interstate common carriers. Along the line of each in Illinois are mining districts within which the operators are dependent upon one or the other of these carriers to get to market their product in excess of local consumption.
Following are the classes of cars involved: (1) Coal cars owned by complainants and used by them in hauling coal for shippers generally; (2) private cars owned by coal mining companies or by their customers and used in conveying coal from the mines to the customers; (3) fuel cars owned by foreign railroads and used on complainants' roads in hauling coal from the mines to the delivery points for the foreign railroads; (4) fuel cars owned by complainants and used by them in carrying coal from the mines to their own coal chutes. Complainants purchase no coal except for their own use.
The greater part of the year there is more equipment at hand than there is coal to haul. But during the winter months a car shortage generally occurs.
Prior to April 13, 1908, complainants were accustomed to deal with a shortage of coal cars in this way: They rated each mine according to the relation its average producing capacity bore to the average producing capacity of the district in which it was located, and they distributed to each mine its pro rata share of the available equipment of class 1, above enumerated; but they did not count or in any way take into consideration the available equipment of classes 2, 3, and 4.
On April 13, 1908, the Interstate Commerce Commission, in a proceeding duly pending, made the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
... ... violation of the act to regulate commerce. Act Feb. 4, 1887, ... c. 104, 24 Stat. 379 (U.S. comp ... first instance to the Interstate Commerce Commission. The ... suit is said to be brought ... ...