Chicago St Ry Co v. State of Minnesota Railroad Warehouse Commission Minneapolis Ry Co v. State of Minnesota Railroad Warehouse Commission
| Decision Date | 24 March 1890 |
| Citation | Chicago St Ry Co v. State of Minnesota Railroad Warehouse Commission Minneapolis Ry Co v. State of Minnesota Railroad Warehouse Commission, 10 S.Ct. 702, 134 U.S. 418, 33 L.Ed. 970 (1890) |
| Parties | CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. RAILROAD & WAREHOUSE COMMISSION. MINNEAPOLIS E. RY. CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. RAILROAD & WAREHOUSE COMMISSION |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
For majority opinions, seeante, 462, 473.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
136 cases
-
Spring Val. Water Co. v. City and County of San Francisco
... ... the provisions of the Constitution of the state of ... California, art. 14, Sec. 1, it is the ... the power of the state is exercised. Chicago, etc., R.R ... Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226, ... Chicago, etc., R.R. Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418, ... 456, 10 Sup.Ct. 462, 466, 33 ... testimony offered by the railroad company as to ... [165 F. 678] ... whether a certain rate fixed by the Railroad and Warehouse ... Commission of that state was reasonable ... 95, 46 L.Ed ... 298; Minneapolis, etc., R.R. Co. v. Minnesota, 186 ... U.S. 257, ... ...
-
Sabre v. Rutland R. Co.
...It remains a legislative function, and the body to which it is committed is a legislative agency (Mr. Justice Bradley in Railroad Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 466, 33 L. Ed. 970), without whose action legislation is incomplete and inefficient. It is only in theory and in a technical sense th......
-
Gulf & S. I. R. Co. v. Laurel Oil & Fertilizer Co.
... ... notice of proceedings before Railroad Commission to fix ... rates, same strictness is ... in adjoining state and acting as assistant freight agent at ... commission ... Chicago, ... etc., Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities ... 789; ... Chicago, etc., Railroad v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418, 33 L.Ed ... 970; Stone v ... ...
-
Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. Torquato
... ... Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 138 ... Pa.Super.Ct. 243, 247 (1939); ... 290; ... Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Co. v ... Paul Railway Co ... v. Minnesota, 134 U.S., supra, the Court said (pp ... 57): " ... In other words, although the railroad ... company is forbidden to establish rates that ... ...
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
The Due Process Clauses of the 5th and 14th Amensments
...[143] Id. at 126-33. [144] 96 U.S. 97, 101-03 (1878). [145] 123 U.S. 623, 661 (1887). [146] Chicago M. & St. P.R. Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418, 456-58 [147] Smyth v. Ames, 169 U.S. 466, 546 (1898). [148] 165 U.S. 578, 583-93 (1897). [149] 198 U.S. 45, 52-60 (1905). [150] Id. at 54-56 ......
-
ARBITRARY PROPERTY INTERFERENCE DURING A GLOBAL PANDEMIC AND BEYOND.
...Bank Farmers Tr. Co., 296 U.S. 85, 89-90 (1935); Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. State of Minn. ex rel. R.R. & Warehouse Comm'n, 134 U.S. 418, 457 (1890); Gundling v. City of Chicago, 177 U.S. 183, 188 (1900); Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 574 (1975); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539......
-
How Many Times Was Lochner-era Substantive Due Process Effective? - Michael J. Phillips
...candidates for the opening and closing years of the Lochner era exist. For the former, Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418 (1890), an early railroad rate regulation case, may be a plausible alternative to Allgeyer. See infra note 6. Another plausible alternative to ......
-
Substantive Due Process Rediscovered: the Rise and Fall of Liberty of Contract - David N. Mayer
...of property or liberty without due process of law. See, e.g., Chi., Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Minn. ex rel. R.R. & Warehouse Comm'n, 134 U.S. 418, 458 (1890) (holding that the reasonableness of a rate set by a state commission must be subject to judicial review); Stone v. Farmers' Loa......
Get Started for Free