Chicago v. Riddle

CourtIllinois Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtBREESE
CitationChicago v. Riddle, 60 Ill. 534, 1871 WL 8192 (Ill. 1871)
Decision Date30 September 1871
PartiesCHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANYv.JOHN RIDDLE.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. ARTHUR A. SMITH, Judge, presiding.

Mr. B. C. COOK and Mr. H. BIGELOW, for the appellants.

Messrs. BASSETT & CONNELL, for the appellee. Mr. JUSTICE BREESE delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action on the case to recover damages of appellants for killing a hog by a railroad train under their control.

The only point we have deemed it necessary to consider is, the admissibility in evidence of statements made by Lampson, the engine driver, made after the accident occurred. Lampson was the agent of appellants for a particular purpose, and whilst in the accomplishment of such purpose, his acts and declarations made at the time would doubtless be evidence to charge the principal. But his declarations made after the purpose for which he was employed has been accomplished, or the act done which he was required to perform, can not be given in evidence against his principal, for they are no part of the res gestæ.

The rule is, that the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • The Chicago & Nw. Ry. Co. v. Clark
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 30, 1878
    ...R. R. Co. v. Gougar, 55 Ill. 503; C. & N. W. R'y Co. v. Fillmore, 57 Ill. 265; C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Lee, 60 Ill. 501; C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Riddle, 60 Ill. 534. The care and caution of a plaintiff is not confined to the very time of the injury, but the question is also involved whether......
  • The Hannibal v. Martin
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 31, 1882
    ...Lane v. Bryant, 9 Gray, 247; C. & N. W. R. R. Co. v. Fillmore, 57 Ill. 266; Furst v. Second Ave. R. R. Co. 72 N. Y. 544; C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Riddle, 60 Ill. 534; C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Lee, 60 Ill. 503; Luby v. H. R. R. R. Co. 17 N. Y. 131; Pittsburg R. R. Co. v. Theobald, 51 Ind. 246;......
  • La Rue v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1893
    ...N.W. 419; Goetz v. Bank, 119 U.S. 551, 7 S.Ct. 318; Packet Co. v. Clough, 20 Wall. 528; Insurance Co. v. Mahone, 21 Wall. 152; Railroad Co. v. Riddle, 60 Ill. 534; Steamship Co. v. Landreth, 102 Pa. St. Clunie v. Lumber Co., (Cal.) 7 Pac. Rep. 708. We are unable to discover any theory upon ......
  • La Rue v. St. Anthony & D. Elevator Co.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1893
    ...54 Wis. 140, 11 N.W. 419; Goetz v. Bank, 7 SCt 318; Packet Co. v. Clough, 20 Wall. 528; Insurance Co. v. Mahone, 21 Wall. 152; Railroad Co. v. Riddle, 60 Ill. 534; Steamship Co. v. Landreth, 102 Pa. St. 131; Clunie v. Lumber Co., (Cal.) 7 Pac. 708. We are unable to discover any theory upon ......
  • Get Started for Free