Childs v. Bainer

Decision Date20 September 1994
Citation231 Conn. 924,648 A.2d 162
PartiesHarry CHILDS v. Frank BAINER.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

Karen P. Blado, Hartford, in support of the petition.

James A. Mulhall, Jr., Naugatuck, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 35 Conn.App. 301, 645 A.2d 1041 (AC 12693), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Is it an abuse of discretion for a trial court to refuse an additur in a personal injury case in which the jury awarded economic damages but no noneconomic damages?"

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 books & journal articles
  • The Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act,
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 69, 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...rather than all damages, are reduced on account of collateral source benefits. 162. 35 Conn. App. 301, 645 A.2d 1041, cert. granted, 231 Conn. 924, 648 A.2d 162 (1994). 163. 35 Conn. App. 673, A.2d (1994). 164. Id. at 677. 165. 2 Conn. App. 579, 625 A.2d 1366 (1984). 166. 35 Conn. App. 455,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT