Childs v. State
| Decision Date | 02 February 1967 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 418 |
| Citation | Childs v. State, 194 So.2d 864, 280 Ala. 711 (Ala. 1967) |
| Parties | Willie Joe CHILDS v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Morel Montgomery and Fred Blanton, Birmingham, for petitioner.
Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.
Petition of Willie Joe Childs for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Childs v. State, 194 So.2d 861.
Writ denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Wilcox v. State
...witness an accomplice in an underlying burglary or larceny. Childs v. State, 43 Ala.App. 529, 194 So.2d 861, cert. denied, Ala.App., 194 So.2d 864 (1966); Pearson v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 343 So.2d 538 (1977); Summers v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 348 So.2d 1126, cert. denied, Ala., 348 So.2d 1136 (......
-
Wright v. State
...is not, as a matter of law, an accomplice to the thief, Childs v. State, 43 Ala.App. 529, 194 So.2d 861 (1966), cert. denied, 280 Ala. 711, 194 So.2d 864 (1967), neither is one who receives embezzled property an accomplice to the embezzler. Even assuming that Macon Brock was an accomplice t......
-
Humber v. State
...cert. denied, Ex parte Kyles, 358 So.2d 799 (Ala.1978); Childs v. State, 43 Ala.App. 529, 532, 194 So.2d 861, cert. denied, 280 Ala. 711, 194 So.2d 864 (1966). An exception to this general rule is that "a receiver of the stolen property is an accomplice of the thief for purposes of corrobor......
-
Gaines v. State, 1 Div. 736
...indictment "it [is] immaterial who owned the building." Childs v. State, 43 Ala.App. 529, 194 So.2d 861 (1966), cert. denied, 280 Ala. 711, 194 So.2d 864 (1967); see, Love v. State, 36 Ala.App. 693, 63 So.2d 285 Moreover, the constitutional requirements for a sufficient indictment were sati......