Chisholm v. Jahncke Dry Docks, Inc.
Decision Date | 01 April 1929 |
Docket Number | 11,446 |
Citation | 10 La.App. 323,121 So. 684 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Parties | CHISHOLM v. JAHNCKE DRY DOCKS, INC |
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, Division "C".Hon. E. K. Skinner, Judge.
Action by M. F. Chisholm against Jahncke Dry Docks, Inc.
There was judgment for plaintiff and defendant appealed.
Judgment reversed.
O. H Dabezies, of New Orleans, attorney for plaintiff, appellee.
Gordon Boswell, of New Orleans, attorney for defendant, appellant.
This is a suit under the Compensation Law.The sole question presented is whether plaintiff, an employee of defendant, was "seriously permanently disfigured about the face" within the meaning of clause 16 of paragraph (d) subsection 1, section 8 of Act 85 of 1926.
Plaintiff's alleged disfigurement consists of a scar three centimeters in length and one-third of a centimeter in width, running diagonally along the left side of his face in the region of the chin, which according to the medical testimony in the record, will gradually bleach out and narrow, become less apparent, and eventually be difficult of observation.
In holding that plaintiff was disfigured within the meaning of the section of the Compensation Law referred to, the trial judge based his conclusion upon the case of Dickson vs U. S. Glass Co.,3 La.App. 83, where it was held that "a scar extending from the upper border of the right eye-brow around the exterior arching of the eye down to about one-quarter of an inch above the middle of the cheek" was such disfigurement as was contemplated by the statute.In that case the scar was two and one-half inches long and one-half inch wide, while in the instant case the scar is considerably shorter and narrower (one and one-half by one-sixth inches); moreover, the same court(Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit)...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Falcone v. Branker
...Motors Corp. v. Shannon, 155 A.2d 237 (Del.Super.Ct.1959), aff'd 161 A.2d 433 (Del.Sup.Ct.1960), and Chisholm v. Jahncke Dry Docks, Inc., 10 La.App. 323, 121 So. 684 (App.Ct.1929). In the case presently before the court, however, this problem need not be resolved as the court does not find ......
-
Templet v. Travelers Ins. Co.
...is not compensable. DeSoto v. Magnolia Pipe Line Company, Inc., 9 La.App. 205, 119 So. 889 1928); Chisholm v. Jahncke Dry-Docks, Inc., 10 La.App. 323, 121 So. 684 (Orl.App.1929). Defendant argues that after the scar revision surgery the scar on plaintiff's nose will no longer be disfiguring......
-
Franklin v. Louisiana Highway Commission
... ... recovery is permitted (Chisholm v. Jahncke Dry ... Docks, 10 La.App. 323, 121 So. 684; DeSoto v ... ...
-
Mitchum v. Inman Mills
... ... eyebrow.' ... In the ... case of Chisholm v. Jahncke Dry Docks, Inc., 10 ... La.App. 323, 121 So. 684, where a scar ... ...