Chord v. Pacer Corp., 13502

Decision Date17 November 1982
Docket NumberNo. 13502,13502
PartiesDonald CHORD, Zoe Grotzke, Doris Mickelson, Wayne S. Chord, Ruth Mayer, Ilowee Owens, Iris Dau, Paul Chord, Sharron Malone, Peggy Hubbard, Casey Chord and Richard Chord, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. PACER CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant.
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

George A. Bangs of Bangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, Rapid City, for plaintiffs and appellees; Joseph M. Butler of Bangs, McCullen, Butler, & Simmons, Rapid City, on brief.

Steven C. Beardsley of Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun, Rapid City, for defendant and appellant.

WOLLMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendering Appellant liable for the royalty on tantalum ore removed from a mine leased by appellees to appellant. We affirm.

Appellees are the children of Roy Chord, who is now deceased. In 1970, Roy Chord and his wife, appellees' stepmother, entered into a mining lease with Robert Cullum. In 1972, the Chords and Robert Cullum formed Pacer Corporation and the terms of the 1970 lease were continued, with Mr. and Mrs. Chord leasing to Pacer Corporation. After Mr. Chord died in 1976, appellees became the royalty owners of the minerals in the Etta Mine, which is located in the Black Hills of South Dakota.

Vern Stratton, an independent miner, removed tantalum ore from the Etta dump in April and May of 1980. Testimony at trial revealed that he was given permission to mine quartz and feldspar but no other minerals. A plant manager, who knew that Stratton was removing tantalum from the Etta Mine, testified that Stratton had told him that he had permission from the general superintendent of Pacer Corporation to mine tantalum. Robert Cullum, the president of Pacer Corporation, became aware of Stratton's activities in early May. At that time Robert Cullum commented to Stratton that it would be interesting to see how much tantalum he would recover from the dump. Approximately one week later he told Stratton to stop his activities and remove himself from Pacer property. Robert Cullum testified at trial that the delay in ordering Stratton off the property was due to his reluctance to confront Stratton in front of a Pacer customer, his desire to inquire whether the general superintendent had given Stratton permission to mine tantalum, and his desire to ascertain the amount of tantalum ore removed from the Etta dump.

Appellees brought this action against Pacer Corporation. The only issue not settled out of court by the parties is whether appellant owes appellees a royalty on the tantalum Stratton removed from the Etta Mine.

Appellant, at the time it appealed this case, was in litigation against Stratton to recover damages for the removal of the tantalum ore. Appellant contends that it is obligated to pay a royalty to appellees only if and when appellant receives any proceeds from the tantalum ore from Stratton. Appellant relies on the following provision of the lease to support its contention:

CONSIDERATION: As consideration for this Lease, the Lessors reserve unto themselves and the Lessee promises and agrees to pay a royalty upon minerals mined, produced or sold from the properties herein concerned as follows:

* * *

2. Beryl and Tantalum: 50% upon all such minerals recovered from the dump presently existing on the property; 15% of such minerals mined from the concerned property; such percentage shall be computed upon the gross proceeds received by the Lessee from and upon the sale of any of such minerals. (emphasis added).

In determining the intent of the parties to a contract, we must consider the entire contract. Kohlman v. Cahill, 301 N.W.2d 664 (S.D.1981); City of Sioux Falls v. Henry Carlson Co., Inc., 258 N.W.2d 676 (S.D.1977). Another relevant provision of the lease provides OPERATING PRACTICES: In all operations conducted upon the property, the Lessee shall conform to and abide by all federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations applicable thereto and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Hisgen v. Hisgen
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1996
    ... ... Chord v. Pacer Corp., 326 N.W.2d 224 (S.D.1982); Johnson v. Johnson, 291 N.W.2d ... ...
  • Weekley v. Weekley, No. 20844
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • December 29, 1999
    ...proper interpretation of a contract the court must seek to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the parties. Chord v. Pacer Corp., 326 N.W.2d 224 (S.D.1982); Johnson v. Johnson, 291 N.W.2d 776 (S.D. 1980); Huffman v. Shevlin, 76 S.D. 84, 72 N.W.2d 852 (1955). In determining the int......
  • Hayes v. Northern Hills General Hosp.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1999
    ... ... (citing Chord v. Pacer Corp., 326 N.W.2d 224 (S.D.1982)) ...         ¶63 We ... ...
  • Mueller v. Cedar Shore Resort, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 20, 2002
    ...and give effect to the intention of the parties. Hisgen v. Hisgen, 1996 SD 122, ¶ 4, 554 N.W.2d 494, 496 (citing Chord v. Pacer Corp., 326 N.W.2d 224 (S.D.1982) (other citations omitted)). While they did not sign the written subscription agreement later prepared by CSR's corporate attorney,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT