Christmas v. Russell
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | CLIFFORD |
| Citation | 5 Wall. 290,18 L.Ed. 475,72 U.S. 290 |
| Parties | CHRISTMAS v. RUSSELL |
| Decision Date | 01 December 1866 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
150 practice notes
-
DiRusso v. DiRusso, V--A
...488, or that the underlying claim would be barred by a statute of limitations of the forum, Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. (72 U.S.) 290, 18 L.Ed. 475. Why a prior forum judgment should be accorded greater recognition than a prior forum statute or policy is not readily apparent. Furthermore,......
-
Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co., 1,813.
...Hawkins v. Barney, 5 Pet. 457, 466, 8 L.Ed. 190; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. 311, 316, 11 L.Ed. 143; Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. 290, 300, 18 L.Ed. 475; Curtis v. Whitney, 13 Wall. 68, 72, 20 L.Ed. 513; Sohn v. Waterson, 17 Wall. 596, 21 L.Ed. 737; [132 F. 439] Terry v. Anderson, 95 U.S. 62......
-
Whitley v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.
...(U.S.) 234, 4 L.Ed. 378; Cheever v. Wilson, 9 Wall, (U.S.) [23 Idaho 646] 123, 19 L.Ed. 604; Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. (U.S.) 302, 18 L.Ed. 475.) Defendant has discharged his full obligation when he has paid the judgment rendered against him. It is for the parties entitled to participat......
-
McDade v. Moynihan
...a defendant can consent to be bound in advance of action brought or must be served with process afterwards. See Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. 290, 18 L.Ed. 475; Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230, 28 S.Ct. 641, 52 L.Ed. 1039; Kenney v. Supreme Lodge, 252 U.S. 411, 40 S.Ct. 371, 64 L.Ed. 638; R......
Request a trial to view additional results
150 cases
-
DiRusso v. DiRusso, V--A
...488, or that the underlying claim would be barred by a statute of limitations of the forum, Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. (72 U.S.) 290, 18 L.Ed. 475. Why a prior forum judgment should be accorded greater recognition than a prior forum statute or policy is not readily apparent. Furthermore,......
-
Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co., 1,813.
...Hawkins v. Barney, 5 Pet. 457, 466, 8 L.Ed. 190; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. 311, 316, 11 L.Ed. 143; Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. 290, 300, 18 L.Ed. 475; Curtis v. Whitney, 13 Wall. 68, 72, 20 L.Ed. 513; Sohn v. Waterson, 17 Wall. 596, 21 L.Ed. 737; [132 F. 439] Terry v. Anderson, 95 U.S. 62......
-
Whitley v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.
...(U.S.) 234, 4 L.Ed. 378; Cheever v. Wilson, 9 Wall, (U.S.) [23 Idaho 646] 123, 19 L.Ed. 604; Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. (U.S.) 302, 18 L.Ed. 475.) Defendant has discharged his full obligation when he has paid the judgment rendered against him. It is for the parties entitled to participat......
-
McDade v. Moynihan
...a defendant can consent to be bound in advance of action brought or must be served with process afterwards. See Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. 290, 18 L.Ed. 475; Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230, 28 S.Ct. 641, 52 L.Ed. 1039; Kenney v. Supreme Lodge, 252 U.S. 411, 40 S.Ct. 371, 64 L.Ed. 638; R......
Request a trial to view additional results