Christofferson v. Church of Scientology of Portland
Decision Date | 10 June 1982 |
Docket Number | No. A7704-05184,A7704-05184 |
Citation | 644 P.2d 577,57 Or.App. 203 |
Parties | , 40 A.L.R.4th 1017 Julie CHRISTOFFERSON, Respondent, v. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Church of Scientology, Mission of Davis, a nonprofit California corporation doing business in Oregon, Delphian Foundation, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, and Martin Samuels, Appellants. ; CA 15952. |
Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Garry P. McMurry, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Patric J. Doherty, Ronald L. Wade, Rankin, McMurry, VavRosky & Doherty, William T. Powers and Powers & Powers, Portland.
Elden M. Rosenthal and Leslie M. Roberts, Portland, filed a brief amicus curiae for Cooperating Counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon.
James K. Hopps, Portland, Lee Boothby, and Robert W. Nixon, Washington, D. C., filed a brief amicus curiae for Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
Before GILLETTE, P. J., YOUNG, J., and ROBERTS, J. Pro Tem.
Defendants appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in her action for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress ("outrageous conduct"). 1 Plaintiff's fraud cause of action alleged 14 misrepresentations which induced her to pay some $3,000 to defendants. Her cause of action for outrageous conduct alleged in two counts a scheme to gain control of her mind and to force her into a life of service to defendants and a course of retaliatory conduct after plaintiff disassociated herself from defendants. Defendants interposed various defenses, including a defense based upon the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The jury awarded compensatory and punitive damages. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiff is a young woman who moved to Portland from Eureka, Montana, in July, 1975, shortly after she graduated from high school, intending to obtain some work experience before going to college in the fall to study civil engineering. When she first arrived, she stayed for a few days with a friend from Montana, Pat Osler, and then moved into an apartment with a young woman she met through Osler. She soon found a job with an engineering firm and worked there full-time.
Defendants are the Church of Scientology of Portland (COSOP), a religious corporation; the Church of Scientology, Mission of Davis (the Mission), also a religious corporation; the Delphian Foundation (Delphian), a non-profit educational institution not expressly organized as a church-related school; and Martin Samuels, an ordained minister of the Church of Scientology and the president of the Mission and Delphian.
The beliefs of Scientology were summarized in Founding Church of Scientology v. United States, 409 F.2d 1146, 1151-52, (D.C.Cir.1969), in a manner which appears to be accurate according to the record before us in this case:
"The movement apparently rests almost entirely upon the writings of one man, L. Ron Hubbard, an American who maintained the headquarters of the "The basic theory of Dianetics is that man possesses both a reactive mind and an analytic mind. The analytic mind is a superior computer, incapable of error, to which can be attributed none of the human misjudgments which create social problems and much individual suffering. These are traceable rather to the reactive mind, which is made up of 'engrams,' or patterns imprinted on the nervous system in moments of pain, stress or unconsciousness. These imprinted patterns may be triggered by stimuli associated with the original imprinting, and may then produce unconscious or conditioned behavior which is harmful or irrational.
movement in England at the time this action was brought. In the early 1950's, Hubbard wrote tracts elucidating what he called 'Dianetics.' Dianetics is a theory of the mind which sets out many of the therapeutic techniques now used by Scientologists, * * *.
From Dianetics developed Scientology, which incorporates Dianetics, but includes broader concepts. As characterized in Founding Church, supra:
"With Scientology came much of the overlay which lends color to the characterization of the movement as a religious one. Hubbard has claimed kinship between his theories and those espoused by Eastern religions, especially Hinduism and Buddhism. He argues that man is essentially a free and immortal spirit (a 'thetan' in Scientological terminology) which merely inhabits the 'mest body' ('mest' is an acronym of the words matter, energy, space, time). Man is said to be characterized by the qualities of 'beingness,' 'havingness,' and 'doingness.' The philosophical theory was developed that the world is constructed on the relationships of 'Affinity,' 'Reality' and 'Communication,' which taken together are denominated The thetan is said by Hubbard to be immortal; it is the spirit controlling the body, through the mind. After the death of the body, the thetan "exteriorizes" and returns in another body. The thetan does not care to remember the life just lived when separated from the body and mind, but because each individual comes back, he is responsible for what goes on today because he will experience it tomorrow.
'the ARC Triangle.' " 409 F.2d at 1152. (Footnotes omitted).
Plaintiff became involved with Scientology 2 almost immediately upon arriving in Portland. Her friend Osler was taking courses from the Mission and, on his advice, she enrolled in a communications course offered by the Mission. As part of the enrollment process, she also applied for membership in the Church of Scientology. Because she was not yet 18 years old, she was told that she must obtain her mother's consent to receive the services offered by the Mission. She telephoned her mother and dictated a consent form which her mother typed, signed and returned.
Plaintiff paid $50 for the communications course and began attending classes at the Mission every evening after work and at least one day on the weekends. Before completing the communications course, she signed up for another course and continued to participate in courses and services offered at the Mission until the beginning of October, 1975.
In early September, plaintiff applied to become a provisional staff member at Delphian, located at Sheridan, Oregon. She informed her parents that she had decided not to attend college that fall. Moving to Delphian in early October, she worked as a provisional staff member until the beginning of December. At that time, she was asked to leave Delphian until she could convince her mother to stop opposing her involvement in Scientology. Plaintiff moved from Sheridan back to Portland and worked as a waitress. While there, she worked with a staff member of the Mission, attempting to convince her parents not to interfere with Scientology.
Plaintiff went home for Christmas and then returned to Portland in the early part of January, 1976. She lived with several people, mainly Scientologists, and continued to work as a waitress. She did not participate in courses or programs at the Mission, but continued to work on "handling" her parents. In April, 1976, plaintiff went to her parents' home in Montana to "handle" them, that is, to convince them to accept her involvement in Scientology, or else to "disconnect" from them. When she reached home, she was locked in the house and "deprogrammed." She did not return to her involvement with Scientology and, in fact, became active in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Molko v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World Christianity
...the First Amendment the statements must be viewed in the light of the doctrines of that religion. (Christofferson v. Church of Scientology, Etc. (1982) 57 Or.App. 203, 239, 644 P.2d 577, 600, cert. den. (1983) 459 U.S. 1206, 103 S.Ct. 1196, 75 L.Ed.2d 439 and 459 U.S. 1227, 103 S.Ct. 1234, ......
-
Molko v. Holy Spirit Assn.
...of social toleration. (Lewis v. Holy Spirit Ass'n, supra, 119 A.D.2d 200, 506 N.Y.S.2d 174; see also Christofferson v. Church of Scientology (1981) 57 Or.App. 203, 644 P.2d 577, 584.) Thus, the critical issue is whether the act of brainwashing becomes tortious because it was preceded by the......
-
Church of Scientology Flag Service Org., Inc. v. City of Clearwater
...and on remand, United States v. Article or Device Hubbard Electrometer, 333 F.Supp. 357 (D.D.C.1971); Christofferson v. Church of Scientology, 57 Or.App. 203, 644 P.2d 577, 580-81, pet'n denied, 293 Or. 456, 650 P.2d 928 (1982), and cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206, 103 S.Ct. 1196, 75 L.Ed.2d 43......
-
DeBose By and Through DeBose v. Bear Valley Church of Christ, 92CA1929
...nature of the conduct has been deemed to provide a defense to a civil claim based on that conduct. See Christofferson v. Church of Scientology, Inc., 57 Or.App. 203, 644 P.2d 577 (1982) (cited with approval in Destefano v. Grabrian, supra ). See generally Annotation, Free Exercise of Religi......
-
Religious Healing in the Courts: the Liberties and Liabilities of Patients, Parents, and Healers
...Schaick v. Church of Scientology of Cal., Inc., 535 F. Supp. 1125 (D. Mass. 1982); Christofferson v. Church of Scientology of Portland, 644 P.2d 577 (Or. Ct. App.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 516. United States v. Carruthers, 152 F.2d 512 (7th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 787 (1946).......