Christopher v. State of Fla.
Citation | 582 F. Supp. 633 |
Decision Date | 13 March 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 82-1293-Civ-JLK.,82-1293-Civ-JLK. |
Parties | William D. CHRISTOPHER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Joseph Daye, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for petitioner.
William E. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, Fla., for respondent.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
On June 15, 1982, a death warrant was signed by the Governor of the State of Florida for the execution of William D. Christopher. Mr. Christopher then filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus seeking a stay of execution. The stay was granted on June 23, 1982, to permit this court to review the federal constitutional claims of petitioner. 541 F.Supp. 734.
In June of 1982, the United States Court of Appeals had under consideration a case challenging the alleged consideration of ex parte information by Justices of the Florida Supreme Court. The Petitioner Christopher raised this identical issue in his petition and asked for a stay until the appellate process was completed. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in Ford v. Strickland, 676 F.2d 434, cert. den. ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 201, 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983) rejected the contention that the Florida Supreme Court had unconstitutionally considered such information in these cases. This court then proceeded to hold several hearings on all of the issues raised in Mr. Christopher's petition for Habeas Corpus.
The tragic events of this case commenced in 1962, with the birth of Norma Sands in Memphis, Tennessee, as the daughter of William D. Christopher and Patricia Sands. Christopher, the petitioner herein, was not married to his daughter's mother and was in prison at the time she was born. Patricia Sands, unable to provide for the baby under these circumstances gave the child to her close friend, Bertha Skillin, to raise. Eventually, Bertha left Memphis and moved to Florida with Norma, all the while maintaining a good relationship with the natural mother, Patricia Sands. Norma met her father, William Christopher, for the first time in the summer of 1977, when she returned to Memphis for a vacation visit with her natural mother. She was thirteen years old at this point in her life.
Norma's next encounter with her father was in 1977, when the petitioner showed up in Naples, Florida, where she was living with her adoptive mother, Bertha Skillin and Bertha's companion, George Ahern. George and Bertha, feeling sorry for the petitioner, invited Christopher to move in with them temporarily until he could find a place to stay.
Within a short period of time Christopher and Norma developed an incestuous relationship, and decided to leave Naples and return to Memphis. Realizing that Bertha would never approve of her teenage adoptive daughter leaving Florida with Christopher, they devised a plan to leave secretly. On the morning of August 21, 1977, Christopher planned to drive Norma to school, returning to the house to pick up their personal belongings while George and Bertha were out and leaving for Memphis after school let out.
Unfortunately for Bertha, she discovered Christopher's plan, confronted him and attempted to call the police. Christopher killed her with a gun shot to the head, and dragged her bleeding body from the kitchen, down the hall, where he concealed it in the bathroom.
Later in the morning, an unsuspecting George Ahern returned from an early morning fishing trip. Without telling Ahern that he had just murdered Bertha and hidden her body in the back bathroom, Christopher asked Ahern for a loan. Ahern agreed and Christopher accompanied him to the Naples Bank where $300.00 was withdrawn from George and Bertha's account and given to the petitioner. After returning to the apartment Christopher and Ahern engaged in an argument resulting in Ahern being knocked to the floor. Ahern ran from Christopher, down the hall and into the bedroom, slamming the door shut. Christopher pushed open the door and shot Ahern twice, once in the arm and once in the head, killing him.
Leaving the two murder victims in the apartment, Christopher then picked Norma up from school and fled to Tennessee where he was apprehended on September 22, 1977. Shortly thereafter, he gave a statement to Memphis police confessing to both murders.
A. The State of Florida tried petitioner twice for the murders of Bertha Skillin and George Ahern. The first trial, in May 1978 resulted in a hung jury and mistrial. At the second trial, Christopher was convicted by a jury of two counts of first degree murder and on August 18, 1978, he was sentenced to death, as recommended by the jury. The conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal by the Supreme Court of Florida. 407 So.2d 198 (Fla.1981), cert. den. 456 U.S. 910, 102 S.Ct. 1761, 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982). The Florida Supreme Court reviewed the case a second time in June 1982, on an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence and on a petition for writ of error coram nobis. The Florida Supreme Court again upheld the conviction and sentence. 416 So.2d 450 (Fla.1982).
B. In the course of the two appeals, the Florida Supreme Court reviewed thirteen issues:
1. denial of psychological and psychiatric examinations
2. proportionality of sentence
3. admissibility of the polygraph examination
4. consideration of ex parte information by the Florida Supreme Court
5. improper processing of the death warrant
6. selective exclusion of jurors
7. effective assistance of counsel
8. the existence of evidence showing a motive for Norma Sands to have committed the murders
9. the existence of new evidence showing that Norma Sands committed the murders
10. admissibility of the defendant's confession
11. admissibility of evidence of the defendant's sexual relationship with his daughter
12. propriety of the trial court's refusal to order a sodium pentothal examination
13. consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors.
We turn to a consideration of petitioner's contentions.
This sentencing procedure was upheld in Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242, 248, 96 S.Ct. 2960, 2965, 49 L.Ed.2d 913 (1976) holding:
The Florida Supreme Court has stated that:
"... The procedure to be followed by the trial judges and juries is not a mere counting process of X number of aggravating circumstances and Y number of mitigating circumstances, but rather a reasoned judgment as to what factual situations require the imposition of death and which can be satisfied by life imprisonment in light of the totality of the circumstances present." ... Elledge v. State, 346 So.2d 998, 1003 (Fla.1977), quoting State v. Dixon, 283 So.2d 1, 10 (Fla.1973). See Barclay v. Florida supra 103 S.Ct. at 3431.
"This determination requires the trial judge to focus on the circumstances of the crime and the character of the individual defendant." Proffitt v. Florida, supra 428 U.S. at 251, 96 S.Ct. at 2966.
If a defendant is sentenced to die, the Florida Supreme Court can review that case in light of other decisions and determine if the death penalty is too great. State v. Dixon, supra at 10.4
Petitioner asserts that the Florida courts have not properly construed the law pertaining to aggravating and mitigating circumstances in this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Langley v. Coughlin
... ... Thomas COUGHLIN, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Defendants ... Corean EVANS, Plaintiff, ... Thomas ... ...
-
Boles v. Foltz
...702 F.2d 299, 318 (2nd Cir.1983); United States ex rel. Riley v. Franzen, 653 F.2d 1153, 1158 (7th Cir.1981); Christopher v. Florida, 582 F.Supp. 633, 644 (S.D.Fla.1984). ...
-
Christopher v. State of Fla.
...granted the stay on June 23, 1982; on March 13, 1984, the court denied habeas relief without an evidentiary hearing. 5 Christopher v. State, 582 F.Supp. 633 (S.D.Fla.1984). Christopher The petitioner subsequently filed with the district court a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Ru......
-
Central Ill. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. DUPAGE CTY. BANK
... ... Hoover v. Franzen, 669 F.2d 433, 437 (7th Cir.1982) (footnote omitted) explains state law — here Illinois law 7 — controls that claim: ... This crucial choice-of-law issue is ... ...