Christopulos v. Christopulos
| Citation | 208 A.D.3d 749,172 N.Y.S.3d 637 (Mem) |
| Decision Date | 24 August 2022 |
| Docket Number | 2021–06093,Index No. 705015/14 |
| Parties | Gregory CHRISTOPULOS, respondent, v. Katherine CHRISTOPULOS, etc., et al., defendants, Nicholas Spyreas, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Nicholas Spyreas, Greenwich, Connecticut, appellant pro se.
The Dweck Law Firm, LLP, New York, NY (Jack S. Dweck and Christopher S. Fraser of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, for an accounting and to cancel a notice of mechanic's lien, the defendant Nicholas Spyreas appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Frederick D.R. Sampson, J.), entered September 30, 2019. The order granted the plaintiff's motion to discharge a mechanic's lien.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant's failure to file proof of service of the notice of mechanic's lien within 35 days of the filing of the notice of lien on April 2, 2019, as required by Lien Law § 11, automatically terminated the notice as a lien, and as such, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion to discharge the mechanic's lien (see Matter of Heavy Constr. Co., Inc. v. Metro Constr. Equities, Inc., 130 A.D.3d 622, 10 N.Y.S.3d 887 ; Outrigger Constr. Co. v. Nostrand Ave. Dev. Corp., 217 A.D.2d 689, 690, 630 N.Y.S.2d 332 ; Matter of Podolsky v. Narnoc Corp., 196 A.D.2d 593, 594–595, 601 N.Y.S.2d 320 ; 146 W. 45th St. Corp. v. McNally, 188 A.D.2d 410, 591 N.Y.S.2d 402 ).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Williams
...JJ.DECISION & ORDERAppeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Richard L. Buchter, J.), dated May 30, 172 N.Y.S.3d 637 2019, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.ORDERED that the order is affi......
-
Christopulos v. Christopulos
...v. Christopulos , 207 A.D.3d 698, 170 N.Y.S.3d 885, 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 04712 ; [ Christopulos v. Christopulos , ––– A.D.3d ––––, 172 N.Y.S.3d 637, Appellate Division Docket No. 2021–06093 ; decided herewith]). The fifth is the subject of this appeal.In accordance with a 2018 order of the Su......
-
Christopulos v. Christopulos
...30, 2019 (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876 ; see also [ Christopulos v. Christopulos, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 172 N.Y.S.3d 637, Appellate Division Docket No. 2021–06093 ; decided herewith]).At this juncture, we decline the plaintiff's reques......