Citak v. The Ohio State Univ., Office of Univ. Compliance & Integrity, 2021-00563PQ

CourtCourt of Claims of Ohio
Writing for the CourtPATRICK E. SHEERAN, Judge.
Citation2022 Ohio 1616
PartiesRACHEL CITAK Requester v. THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE AND INTEGRITY Respondent
Docket Number2021-00563PQ
Decision Date06 April 2022

2022-Ohio-1616

RACHEL CITAK Requester
v.

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE AND INTEGRITY Respondent

No. 2021-00563PQ

Court of Claims of Ohio

April 6, 2022


JUDGMENT ENTRY

PATRICK E. SHEERAN, Judge.

{¶1} On March 11, 2022, a Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends the (1) issuance of an order denying Requester's claim for disclosure of certain records withheld by Respondent and (2) the assessment of court costs to Requester. (R&R, 8.)

{¶2} Neither party has timely filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master's report and recommendation, then this Court is required to "promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation."

{¶3} The Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Special Master's Report and Recommendation of March 11, 2022. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Court denies Requester's claim for disclosure of certain records withheld by Respondent. Court costs are assessed to

1

Requester. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

2

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT