Citigroup v. Kopelowitz
Decision Date | 22 February 2017 |
Citation | 147 A.D.3d 1014,48 N.Y.S.3d 223 |
Parties | CITIGROUP, etc., respondent, v. Tzivya C. KOPELOWITZ, also known as Tzivya C. Lieber, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lee M. Nigen, Brooklyn, NY (Ellery Ireland of counsel), for appellants.
Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates, P.C., Plainview, NY (Lijue T. Philip and Andrew Morganstern of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, ROBERT J. MILLER, and JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Tzivya C. Kopelowitz, also known as Tzivya C. Lieber, and David Kopelowitz appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nahman, J.), entered May 13, 2015, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
"To establish a prima facie case in an action to foreclose a mortgage, a plaintiff must produce the mortgage, the unpaid note, and evidence of default" (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Weinberger, 142 A.D.3d 643, 644, 37 N.Y.S.3d 286 ; see HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Spitzer, 131 A.D.3d 1206, 1207, 18 N.Y.S.3d 67 ). There is no requirement that a plaintiff in a foreclosure action rely on any particular set of business records to establish a prima facie case, so long as the plaintiff satisfies the admissibility requirements of CPLR 4518(a), and the records themselves actually evince the facts for which they are relied upon (accord North Am. Sav. Bank, FSB v. Esposito–Como, 141 A.D.3d 706, 35 N.Y.S.3d 491 ; Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Tomanelli, 139 A.D.3d 688, 32 N.Y.S.3d 181 ; HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Spitzer, 131 A.D.3d 1206, 18 N.Y.S.3d 67 ).
Here, the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by producing the note and mortgage, and the affidavit of Phonesay Say, a vice president of the plaintiff's loan servicer, attesting to the appellants' default based upon his review of payment records kept in the regular course of the loan servicer's business (see Emigrant Bank v. Marando, 143 A.D.3d 856, 39 N.Y.S.3d 83 ). Contrary to the appellants' contentions, Say's affidavit was sufficient proof of their default because the business records he relied upon satisfied the admissibility requirements of CPLR 4518(a), and the records themselves actually evinced the facts underlying the appellants' default (see North Am. Sav. Bank, FSB v. Esposito–Como, 141 A.D.3d 706, 35 N.Y.S.3d 491 ; Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Tomanelli, 139 A.D.3d 688, 32 N.Y.S.3d 181 ; HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Spitzer, 131 A.D.3d 1206, 18 N.Y.S.3d 67 ). In opposition, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see TD Bank, N.A. v. Mandia, 133 A.D.3d 590, 591, 20 N.Y.S.3d 83 ).
Contrary to the appellants' contention, by failing to raise the issue of the plaintiff's standing to commence this action in their answer (see CPLR 3018[b] ), or make a pre-answer motion to dismiss based on lack of standing (see CPLR 3211[e] ), they waived the issue (see JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Butler, 129 A.D.3d 777, 780, 12 N.Y.S.3d 145 ; Wells...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n v. Ozcan
...of CPLR 4518(a), and the records themselves actually evince the facts for which they are relied upon" ( Citigroup v. Kopelowitz, 147 A.D.3d 1014, 1015, 48 N.Y.S.3d 223 ; cf. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Thomas, 150 A.D.3d 1312, 52 N.Y.S.3d 894 ). Thus, mailing may be proved by any number of docu......
-
Bank of N.Y. v. Morga
...the business records exception to the rule against hearsay under CPLR 4518 (citations omitted)." In fact, in Citigroup v. Kopelowitz, 147 A.D.3d 1014, 48 N.Y.S.3d 223 (2d Dept.2017), which was decided by the Second Department one week after Pappas, the court held:There is no requirement tha......
-
Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB v. DeCanio, 600554/15.
..."and the records themselves actually evince the facts for which they are relied upon (citations omitted)" ( Citigroup v. Kopelowitz, 147 A.D.3d 1014, 48 NYS3d 223 [2d Dept 2017] ; see also Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Naughton, 137 A.D.3d at 1200, 28 N.Y.S.3d 444, supra ). Therefore, th......
-
Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n v. Brannon, 380976/07.
...in the affidavit of merit put before the court as evidence of a defendant's default in payment (see Citigroup v. Kopelowitz, 147 A.D.3d 1014, 1015, 48 N.Y.S.3d 223 [2d Dept.2017] ["There is no requirement that a plaintiff in a foreclosure action rely on any particular set of business record......