CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Equity Bank, N.A.
Decision Date | 18 August 2017 |
Docket Number | Case No. 4:15–CV–230–SPM |
Citation | 261 F.Supp.3d 942 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri |
Parties | CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Plaintiff, v. EQUITY BANK, N.A., Defendant. |
Jason Kempf, Ketrina G. Bakewell, Louis F. Bonacorsi, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff.
Evan Z. Reid, Lewis Rice, LLC, St. Louis, MO, Thomas M. Martin, Joseph Matthew Conlon, Maxwell Cory Nelson, Lewis Rice, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff CitiMortgage, Inc.'s ("CMI's") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 123); Defendant Equity Bank, N.A.'s ("Equity's") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 115); and Equity's Motion to Strike Portions of Affidavit of Isaac Miller. (Doc. 187). The motions are fully briefed and ready for disposition. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (Doc. 23).
On January 31, 2006, CMI and Equity entered into a contract entitled "Correspondent Agreement Form 200" (the "Agreement"). (Doc. 131–2, Agreement; Doc. 126, CMI's Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts, ¶ 7; Doc. 128, Equity's Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts, ¶ 1). The Agreement provides, in part, that "[f]rom time to time, Correspondent [Equity] may sell to CMI and CMI may purchase from Correspondent [Equity] one or more residential mortgage, home equity or other loans ('Loan(s)') in accordance with the terms, conditions, requirements, procedures, representations and warranties set forth in the 'CitiMortgage, Inc. Correspondent Manual' and all amendments, bulletins, program requirements and supplements to such Manual [collectively, the 'CMI Manual'] and the Agreement." (Doc. 131–2, Agreement, § 1). The Agreement states that the CMI Manual is incorporated by reference into the Agreement. (Id. )
Among the representations and warranties made by Equity to CMI under the Agreement are those set forth in Section 2(k), wherein Equity represented and warranted:
That each mortgage, home equity or other Loan (i) shall be fully enforceable and originated in accordance with the terms, conditions, representations, warranties and covenants contained in the CMI Manual and this Agreement which were in effect as of the Loan closing date, (ii), if applicable, was serviced in accordance with applicable Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, VA, and/or HUD requirements and industry standards, and (iii) is subject to no defects or defenses, including but not limited to damage to the property securing the Loan, lien imperfections or environmental risk.
(Id. , § 2(k)). In addition, pursuant to Section 2(q) of the Agreement, Equity represented and warranted "[t]hat it will fully comply with all additional representations, warranties and covenants contained in the CMI Manual." (Id. , § 2(q)). Section 2202 of the CMI Manual contained several additional representations and warranties, including, but not limited to, representations that all information relating to the loan was complete and accurate, and contained no fraud or misrepresentation; that each individual loan sold met CMI guidelines or investor requirements, with the understanding that CMI may sell each loan to a third party; that the loan complied with all agency guidelines, including Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, VA, and FHA guidelines, in effect at the time each loan was sold to CMI; and that any appraisal submitted with each loan was completed in accordance with all state and federal laws, was submitted in support of the value of the property, and could be relied upon by CMI. (Doc. 128, ¶¶ 13–19; Doc. 135–1, CMI Manual, § 2202).
In addition, Section 11 of the Agreement provides:
(Doc. 131–2, Agreement, § 11). The "Repurchase Price" mentioned in Section 11 is defined in the CMI Manual as follows:
REPURCHASE PRICE : The Repurchase Price is defined as the sum of: (i) the current principal balance on the loan as of the paid-to date; (ii) the accrued interest calculated at the mortgage loan Note rate from the mortgage loan paid-to date up to and including the repurchase date; (iii) all unreimbursed advances (including but not limited to tax and insurance advances, delinquency and/or foreclosure expenses, etc.) incurred in connection with the servicing of the mortgage loan, (iv) any price paid in excess of par by CitiMortgage on the funding date, and (v) any other fees, costs or expenses charged by or paid to another investor in connection with the repurchase of the mortgage loan from such investor but only to the extent such fees, costs and expenses exceed the total of items (i) through (iv) above.
(Doc. 136–1, CMI Manual, § 2301).
The Agreement also contains two other provisions relevant to the instant motions. Section 1 of the Agreement states, in relevant part:
CMI may purchase loans with or without conducting a complete review of the Loan documentation. CMI's review of, or failure to review, all or any portion of the loan documentation shall not affect CMI's rights to demand repurchase of a loan or any other CMI right or remedy provided by this Agreement.
Section 14 of the Agreement states, in relevant part:
The failure of either party to exercise any right given to it under this Agreement or to insist on strict compliance of any obligation under the Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any right, including the right to insist on strict compliance in the future.
(Id. , § 14).
Pursuant to the Agreement, Equity sold approximately 470 loans to CMI. (Doc. 126, ¶ 24. Those included the twelve residential mortgage loans at issue in this lawsuit (the "Loans"): the Degrey Loan # XXXXXX2989, the Dewey (Gatesville) Loan # XXXXXX2169, the Dewey (Whistling Straits) Loan # XXXXXX5637, the Hansen Loan # XXXXXX6934, the Henry Loan # XXXXXX3494, the Hunt Loan # XXXXXX0081, the Jensen Loan # XXXXXX2857, the Loucks Loan # XXXXXX8634, the Paulos Loan # XXXXXX9538, the Rivers Loan # XXXXXX0529, Russell Loan # XXXXXX3017, and the Seemungal Loan # XXXXXX1270. (Id. , ¶ 26). Equity underwrote and/or originated each of the Loans. (Id. , ¶ 30). The Loans were sold to CMI between August 24, 2007, and January 22, 2009. (Id. , ¶¶ 32–43). CMI subsequently sold some of the Loans to investors such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (Id. , ¶ 3.)
After purchasing the Loans from Equity, CMI determined that each of the Loans contained one or more defects, including but not limited to the following: the loan application package misrepresented the borrower's income; the debt-to-income ratio for the loan exceeded applicable guidelines; the appraisal contained in the loan application package failed to comply with applicable guidelines and was unsupported; the loan-to-value ratio for the loan exceeded applicable guidelines; the required documentation verifying monthly payments was missing from the loan application; CMI was required to repurchase the loan from an investor, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae; and/or the loan application package was missing necessary income documentation. (Id. , ¶¶ 44, 47–86). For each loan, CMI sent a letter to Equity...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thompson-Harbach v. USAA Federal Sav. Bank
...law without fear that the employer would be subject to additional liability for doing so). See Citimortgage, Inc. v. Equity Bank, N.A. , 261 F.Supp.3d 942, 953 (E.D. Mo. 2017) (noting that if a contract is ambiguous, a company's internal policy reflecting the company's understanding of the ......
-
Robinson v. City of St. Louis
...have moved for summary judgment. See Wermager v. Cormorant Twp. Bd., 716 F.2d 1211, 1214 (8th Cir. 1983); CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Equity Bank, N.A., 261 F.Supp.3d 942, 950 (E.D.Mo. 2017). Summary judgment is proper "if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact ......
-
Direct Biologics, LLC v. Kimera Labs, Inc.
...language or by necessary implication." James E. Brady & Co. v. Eno, 992 F.2d 864, 869 (8th Cir. 1993).CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Equity Bank, N.A., 261 F. Supp. 3d 942, 952 (E.D. Mo. 2017), order clarified, No. 4:15-CV-230-SPM, 2017 WL 7693367 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 1, 2017), and aff'd, 942 F.3d 861 (8t......
-
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Platinum Home Mortg., Case No. 4:15-cv-01242-MTS
...been foreclosed on, the property underlying them had been sold, and the loans no longer existed." CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Equity Bank, N.A., 261 F. Supp. 3d 942, 958-59 (E.D. Mo. 2017). Though the Eighth Circuit affirmed the judgment, it did not "endorse the district court's erroneous conclus......